[问答]

请问谁有早期HP 85052B 3.5 mm校准套件的照片吗？

问答对人有帮助，内容完整，我也想知道答案 0 有没有人有他们可以分享的早期HP 85052B 3.5 mm校准套件的照片？我最近从安捷伦购买了用于85052B 3.5 mm校准套件的泡沫插件。我购买这款产品的目的是用我买的旧HP 85052B校准套件更换泡沫。不幸的是，85052B校准套件的设计多年来发生了变化（尽管安捷伦英国公司告诉我不同），因此HP部件不适合我从安捷伦购买的泡沫。请参见附图，其中我刚刚显示了导致问题的位旧的HP滑动负载比新安捷伦泡沫中允许的空间长。旧的HP连接器量规比新的Agilent连接器量规小。鉴于安捷伦泡沫不适合我所拥有的组件，我别无选择，只能自己制作泡沫。如果可以的话，我更愿意遵循原始的HP布局，但需要照片才能执行此操作。有没有人可以分享？戴夫以上来自于谷歌翻译以下为原文 Does anyone have a photo of a very early HP 85052B 3.5 mm calibration kit they could share? I recently bought from Agilent the foam insert for an 85052B 3.5 mm calibration kit. I puchased this with the intent of replacing the foam from an old HP 85052B cal kit I'd bought. Unfortunately, the design of the 85052B calibration kit has changed over the years (despite Agilent UK telling me different), so the HP parts don't fit the foam I bought from Agilent. See the attached picture, where I've just shown the bits which cause the problem * Old HP sliding loads are longer than the space allowed for them in the new Agilent foam. * Old HP connector gages are smaller than the new Agilent ones. Given the Agilent foam does not fit the components I have, I'm left with no option but to make up the foam myself. I'd prefer to follow the original HP layout if I can, but would need a photo to do this. Does anyone have one they can share? Dave 附件 old-HP-85052B-cal-kit-parts-dont-fit-new-Agilent-foam.jpg195.7 KB 0
2019-6-26 09:03:18　　评论淘帖0 邀请回答您可以邀请以下用户，快速回答问题 × kingnet_52040 该类别下有 195 个回答。邀请回答 60user7 该类别下有 81 个回答。邀请回答蓝色冰汐该类别下有 45 个回答。邀请回答醉狼工作室该类别下有 41 个回答。邀请回答 ianwhoani 该类别下有 30 个回答。邀请回答 dkhwakd 该类别下有 25 个回答。邀请回答 aaabbb567 该类别下有 23 个回答。邀请回答 e08506806 该类别下有 20 个回答。邀请回答 szzjfyp 该类别下有 18 个回答。邀请回答 sonia87 该类别下有 16 个回答。邀请回答 ningee 该类别下有 16 个回答。邀请回答 zouqinxiang 该类别下有 15 个回答。邀请回答 xj5548 该类别下有 15 个回答。邀请回答 daichuangs 该类别下有 14 个回答。邀请回答 derek88 该类别下有 14 个回答。邀请回答 hzmbs2016 该类别下有 12 个回答。邀请回答 JST2006 该类别下有 12 个回答。邀请回答 juujwfdf 该类别下有 11 个回答。邀请回答 bisong13 该类别下有 11 个回答。邀请回答 hu_wflllllllg21 该类别下有 11 个回答。邀请回答举报李青相关推荐 • 如何为SMA设备最好地使用85052B 3.5 mm套件？ 3314 • 使用85052B校准套件校准N5230A网络分析仪要求连接低频带负载 2020 • PTFE垫片卡在85052B校准套件的滑动负载怎么去除？ 2277 • 可以使用3.5 mm连接器量规来检查2.92 mm连接器吗？ 3515 • 如何使用公端口和公标准进行8510B分析仪校准 1534 • 85052D校准套件中使用的3.5 mm母连接器的外导体材料类型 1738 • 如何用滑动载荷定义波导校准套件？ 1658 • 使用9 GHz 3.5 mm校准套件进行20 GHz校准会有多糟糕？ 1229 • 如何使用85052C套件校准N9925a？ 3195 • QuickCal使用哪种RF连接器类型？ 1916 1个回答

答案对人有帮助，有参考价值 0 > {quote：title = jvall写道：} {quote}>是的，泡沫确实发生了变化。谢谢jvall。我想我应该问这个套件是否有任何变化。相反，我向Agilent UK询问泡沫是否适合旧HP套件的盒子。我从来没有得到100％的认可答案，但安捷伦表示他们不知道有任何变化。我想我应该问内部组件是否已经改变。无论如何，我会把泡沫贴在eBay上 - 如果它比安捷伦的价格高得多，那就不会让我感到惊讶！ >我发现我们的套件是在1987年生产的。打开后，我受到了崩解泡沫的欢迎; 你太熟悉的东西。非常感谢非常麻烦地查看并拍照。尽管熵的增加已经尽力破坏有关碎片去向的信息，但它似乎与目前的套件大致相似。即使连接器量规和滑动负载的尺寸发生变化，磁带，滑动负载和连接器量规都处于大致相同的位置。扳手的位置必须有所改变。幸运的是，我所拥有的85050B（7毫米）套件看起来很糟糕，结果还不错。令人惊讶的是，清洁和购买安捷伦的新泡沫对其进行了改进。它比它好1000分贝！但85052B套件没有这样的运气。整体情况较差。特别是Maury Microwave 8035H滑动负载的母头在几个地方缺少金，其中一些我怀疑可能是由于泡沫。它很难说肯定。我希望Maury Microwave能够在最后提供这个位。有一些化学物质可以溶解黄金 - 我不确定“HP泡沫”是否属于这一类！ >旧版本有一个磁带空间。我上个月从安捷伦购买的泡沫具有胶带适合的空间。我想安捷伦现在实际上并没有把磁带放在那里，但是它的空间是泡沫。 >我还添加了更新式滑动负载的图片。再次感谢你那些照片。戴夫以上来自于谷歌翻译以下为原文 > {quote:title=jvall wrote:}{quote} > Yes, the foam did change. Thank you jvall . I guess I should have asked here whether there were any changes to that kit. Instead I asked Agilent UK whether the foam would fit the box for the old HP kit. I never got a 100% authorative answer, but Agilent said they were not aware of any changes. I guess I should have asked whether the internal components had changed. Anyway, I'll stick the foam on eBay - it would not totally suprise me if it fetches more than it cost me from Agilent! > I found our kit that was produced in 1987. Upon opening, I was greeted with disintegrating foam; something you are all too familiar with. Thank you very* for taking the trouble to look and photograph it. Although the increase in entropy has done its best to destroy information about where the pieces go, it appears to be broadly similar to the current kit. The tape, sliding loads and connector gages are all in approximately the same position, even though the connector gages and sliding loads have changed size. The location of the spanner must have changed somewhat. Luckily the 85050B (7mm) kit I have, which arrived looking terrible, turned out OK. It is amazing how a cleanup and buying the new foam from Agilent improved it. It's a 1000 dB better than it was! But no such luck with the 85052B kit. The overall condition is poorer. In particular the female bit of the Maury Microwave 8035H sliding load has gold missing in several places, some of which I'm suspicious might be due to the foam. Its' hard to say for sure. I expect Maury Microwave will be able to supply the bit at the end. There are a few chemicals able to dissolve gold - I'm not sure if "HP foam" falls into that category! > The old version had a space for the tape cartridge. The foam I purchased last month from Agilent has a space where the tape will fit. I guess Agilent don't actually put a tape in there now but the space is in the foam for it. > I also added a picture of the newer style sliding load. Thank you once again for those pictures. Dave

2019-6-26 09:08:25 评论举报李青