QuickCal使用哪种RF连接器类型？

嗨Dave，这是我们在Microwave FieldFox数据表第7页中包含的文字。
http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5990-9783EN.pdf QuicCal - 使用内部和外部标准的子集。
对于具有7/16和N型连接器的DUT，QuickCal最精确，并且针对≤18GHz的频率提供测量不确定性。
使用3.5 mm（m），SMA（m）或其他公同轴连接器降低DUT的精度;
表现未明确。
对于3.5 mm（f），SMA（f）或其他类似的母头连接器，建议不要使用QuickCal。
QuickCal不适用于波导。
另外，我没有忘记关于7/16校准套件（不同线程）的问题。
我只是没有机会解决它。
我需要访问我目前没有登录（太多登录）的系统，以获取图纸/规格文件，以准确回答您的问题。
我很快就会谈到它。
此致，Afsi> {quote：title = drkirkby写道：} {quote}>标题几乎说明了一切！
我没有FieldFox，所以无法检查固件。
>>如果它支持我没有用于校准套件的任何连接器，我会特别感兴趣。
我有>> * 3.5 mm的套件（HP 85052B）+ ---建议继续使用机械校准套件+> * APC7（HP 85050B）----与上述相同> * N（HP 85032B）+ -
---使用QuickCal +> * 7-16（适用于SiteMasters的Anritsu部件）+ ---使用QuickCa l +> * WR90波导（这是一个自制套件，而不是专业套件）。
+ ----不支持QuickCa l + >>我知道有人制定了一些BNC“标准”，如果FieldFox可以测量它们，我会抓住机会这样做，当我在这里有一个FieldFox
天。
>>我必须说，QuickCal非常令人印象深刻。
我知道它在男性SMA或3.5毫米上不能很好地工作。
我认为这是因为公螺母在四处移动，因此以一种基本上随机的方式改变边缘电容，因此任何男性SMA模型都是非常不准确的。
>> Dave >>编辑：drkirkby于2013年12月17日下午3:20



     以下为原文

  Hi Dave,

Here is the text we included in page 7 of the Microwave FieldFox Data Sheet.
http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5990-9783EN.pdf

QuicCal -  Uses internal and a subset of external standards. QuickCal is most accurate for DUTs with 7/16 and
Type-N connectors and measurement uncertainties are provided for frequencies ≤ 18 GHz. Reduced
accuracy for DUTs with 3.5 mm (m), SMA (m), or other male coaxial connectors; performance is
unspecified. QuickCal is not recommended for DUTs with 3.5 mm (f), SMA (f), or other similar female
connectors. QuickCal is not applicable to waveguide.

Also, I have not forgotten about your question on 7/16 cal kits (different thread). I just haven't had a chance to resolve it. I need access to a system that I currently do not have a login for (too many logins), to get the drawings/spec files, to accurately answer your question. I will get to it soon. 

Regards,
Afsi

> {quote:title=drkirkby wrote:}{quote}
> The title pretty much says it all! I don't have a FieldFox any more, so can't check in the firmware. 
> 
> I would be particulary interested if it supported any connectors that I don't have cal kits for. I've got kits for 
> 
> * 3.5 mm (HP 85052B)    +--- Recommend continuing on with your mechanical cal kit+> * APC7 (HP 85050B)   ---- same as above
> * N (HP 85032B) +---- Ok with QuickCal+> 
* 7-16 (Anritsu parts, intended for SiteMasters)  +--- Ok with QuickCa
l+> * WR90 waveguide (this is a home-made kit, not a professional kit).   +---- not supported with QuickCa

l+> 
> I know someone who has made some BNC "standards", and if the FieldFox could measure them, I'd take the opportunity to do so when I have a FieldFox here for a few days. 
> 
> I must say, the QuickCal is pretty impressive. I understand it does not work well on male SMA or 3.5 mm. I assume that is becuase the male nut moves around, so changing the fringing capacitance in a way that is essentially random, so any model of a male SMA would be pretty inaccurate. 
> 
> Dave
> 
> Edited by: drkirkby on Dec 17, 2013 3:20 PM

> {quote：title = am95405写道：} {quote}> Hi Dave，>>这是我们在Microwave FieldFox数据表第7页中包含的文字。
> http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5990-9783EN.pdf虽然该文件未涵盖N9912A，但我认为它基本相似。
> QuicCal - 使用内部和外部标准的子集。
对于具有7/16和> N型连接器的DUT，QuickCal最精确，并且针对≤18GHz的频率提供测量不确定性。
使用3.5 mm（m），SMA（m）或其他公同轴连接器降低DUT的精度;
性能>未指定。
对于3.5 mm（f），SMA（f）或其他类似母头连接器的DUT，建议不要使用QuickCal。
QuickCal不适用于波导。
谢谢。
我希望它能涵盖更广泛的范围，例如BNC，APC7等。“QuickCal不适用于波导”这一点让我想到了几件事。
1）虽然我无法想象它对安捷伦有任何商业利益，但它可能会成为一个有趣的学生项目，试图将QuickCal扩展到波导。
波导的特性是众所周知的，并且对于HFSS或EMPro，末端具有凸缘的波导将相对简单。
我希望在末端带有法兰的开放式波导的S参数可以很容易地计算出来。
我想问题是波导转向同轴电缆。
2）这是否意味着如果系统中有波导，QuickCal会发生故障？
如果有以下串联* FieldFox * N到N电缆* N到波导转换（例如Agilent X281A）*波导部分*波导到N转换（第二个Agilent X281A）QuickCal仍然可以工作吗？
传输线末端的连接器为N，但FieldFox和N连接器之间的传输线特性复杂。
>另外，我没有忘记关于7/16校准套件（不同线程）的问题。
我只是没有机会解决它。
我需要访问我目前没有登录（太多登录）的系统，以获取图纸/规格文件，以准确回答您的问题。
我很快就会谈到它。
我不确定那是什么问题！
我最近问了一对约7-16岁。
戴夫



     以下为原文

  > {quote:title=am95405 wrote:}{quote}
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Here is the text we included in page 7 of the Microwave FieldFox Data Sheet.
> http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5990-9783EN.pdf

Although that document does not cover the N9912A, I assume it is basically similar. 

> QuicCal -  Uses internal and a subset of external standards. QuickCal is most accurate for DUTs with 7/16 and
> Type-N connectors and measurement uncertainties are provided for frequencies ≤ 18 GHz. Reduced
> accuracy for DUTs with 3.5 mm (m), SMA (m), or other male coaxial connectors; performance is
> unspecified. QuickCal is not recommended for DUTs with 3.5 mm (f), SMA (f), or other similar female
> connectors. QuickCal is not applicable to waveguide.

Thank you. I was hoping it was going to cover a wider range, such as BNC, APC7 etc. 

The point that "QuickCal is not applicable to waveguide"  got me thinking of a couple of things. 

1) Although I can't imagine it being of any commercial interest to Agilent, it might make an interesting student project to try to extend QuickCal to waveguide. The characteristcs of waveguide are well known, and of a waveguide with a flange on the end would be relatively simple for HFSS or EMPro. I would expect the S-parameters of an open waveguide with a flange on the end would be simple to compute. I guess the problem would be the waveguide to coax transition. 

2) Does this mean if there is waveguide in the system, the QuickCal breaks down? If one had the following in series

* FieldFox
* N to N cable
* N to waveguide transition (e.g Agilent X281A) 
* Section of waveguide
* Waveguide to N transition (a second Agilent X281A)

would QuickCal still work? The connector on the end of the transmission line is N, but the characteristics of the transmission line between the FieldFox and the N connector are complicated. 

> Also, I have not forgotten about your question on 7/16 cal kits (different thread). I just haven't had a chance to resolve it. I need access to a system that I currently do not have a login for (too many logins), to get the drawings/spec files, to accurately answer your question. I will get to it soon. 

I'm not sure what question that was! I have asked a couple lately about 7-16. 

Dave