Spartan 3A/3E的预期使用寿命是多少？

男，
我会联系您当地的经销商，并要求他们联系Xilinx销售和营销部门，并回复您的建议。
据我所知，Spartan 3A / 3E是最新的（最后的）90nm产品，因此仍然可以广泛使用。
至于它们什么时候停产，这取决于Xilinx客户设计出来的速度，使用更新的产品，或者90年代流程本身在联华电子公司过时的时间。
Spartan2为250nm，据联合电子公司宣布为过程，而斯巴达2E为180nm。
Spartan是旧的4KXL部件，我相信它是350nm，现在已经太老了。
如果有的话，我会推荐Spartan 6（45nm三星工艺），因为它应该具有很长的使用寿命（体积比以前的任何系列都要大）。
Austin Lesea主要工程师Xilinx San Jose
在原帖中查看解决方案



以下为原文

m,
 
I would contact your local distributor, and request that they contact Xilinx sales and marketing, an get back to you on a recommendation.

As far as I know Spartan 3A/3E are the latest (last) 90nm products, and as such, are still widely available.  As to when they will be discontinued, that depends on how quickly Xilinx customers design them out, and use newer products, or how soon the 90nm process itself is made obsolete at UMC.
 
The Spartan2 was 250nm, which was declared obsolete as a process by UMC, as wasSpartan 2E, which is 180nm.
 
Spartan was the old 4KXL part, which was 350nm, I believe, which is far too old now.
 
If anything, I would recommend Spartan 6 (45nm Samsung process), as it should have a very long life (volumes are substantially larger than any previous family).



 
 
Austin Lesea
Principal Engineer
Xilinx San JoseView solution in original post

男，
我会联系您当地的经销商，并要求他们联系Xilinx销售和营销部门，并回复您的建议。
据我所知，Spartan 3A / 3E是最新的（最后的）90nm产品，因此仍然可以广泛使用。
至于它们什么时候停产，这取决于Xilinx客户设计出来的速度，使用更新的产品，或者90年代流程本身在联华电子公司过时的时间。
Spartan2为250nm，据联合电子公司宣布为过程，而斯巴达2E为180nm。
Spartan是旧的4KXL部件，我相信它是350nm，现在已经太老了。
如果有的话，我会推荐Spartan 6（45nm三星工艺），因为它应该具有很长的使用寿命（体积比以前的任何系列都要大）。
Austin Lesea主要工程师Xilinx San Jose



以下为原文

m,
 
I would contact your local distributor, and request that they contact Xilinx sales and marketing, an get back to you on a recommendation.

As far as I know Spartan 3A/3E are the latest (last) 90nm products, and as such, are still widely available.  As to when they will be discontinued, that depends on how quickly Xilinx customers design them out, and use newer products, or how soon the 90nm process itself is made obsolete at UMC.
 
The Spartan2 was 250nm, which was declared obsolete as a process by UMC, as wasSpartan 2E, which is 180nm.
 
Spartan was the old 4KXL part, which was 350nm, I believe, which is far too old now.
 
If anything, I would recommend Spartan 6 (45nm Samsung process), as it should have a very long life (volumes are substantially larger than any previous family).



 
 
Austin Lesea
Principal Engineer
Xilinx San Jose