完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你，还能领取20积分哦， 立即完善>
3天内不再提示
电子发烧友论坛|
我不想重新安装MPLAB-X，以通过所有的条款和条件。在人们开始告诫我不要详细阅读之前，我实际上不是律师，所以条款和条件对我来说意义不大。如果我聘请了一名律师，他/她可能会声称条款和条件对解释是开放的，而唯一的方法就是把他们带到法庭，让他们做出决定。有许多著名的案例对不同的术语和条件的含义有不同的解释。Android的使用Java，很多涉及GPL等的案例，所以为了节省我的法律费用，有人能提供一些关于我是否可以创建MPLAB-X项目并在GITHUB上发布它的建议。我认为我可以，但见我的第一段概述我的法律专业知识。
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 I don't want to have to re-install MPLAB-X, to to through all the terms and conditions. And before people start admonishing me about not reading them in detail, I'm not actually a lawyer so the terms and conditions mean very little to me. If I hired a lawyer he/she might claim that terms and conditions are open to interpretation and the only way to fully test them is to take them to the courts, to let them decide. There are many famous cases where different interpretations about on the meaning of various terms and conditions. Android's use of Java, Numerous cases involving the GPL etc. etc. So to save me the legal expenses could somebody offer some advice as to whether I can create an MPLAB-X project and publish it on github. I'd assume that I can, but see my first paragraph which outlines my legal expertise. 
0
|
|
相关推荐
9个回答
|
|
|
我想你可以发布你所有的代码，如果你的文件里面有一些微芯片代码，那么有些警告。至于“项目”，嗯，我只是不关心和跳过它。
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 I suppose you *can* publish all of your code, with some caveat if pieces of Microchip code are inside your files. As for the "project", well, I'd just not care |
|
|
|
|
|
问得好。也许你可以打开一张支持票问Microchip？
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 Good question. Maybe you could open a support ticket and ask Microchip ? |
|
|
|
|
|
好问题，好答案：我会在Microchip网站上寻找它。
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 Good question, good answer : ) I'm gonna look for it on Microchip's site. |
|
|
|
|
|
好主意，但我想他们会告诉他阅读那些条款和条件来掩饰自己。
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 Wonderful idea but I guess they'll tell him to read those terms and conditions to cover themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
我一直在寻找某种答案，但到目前为止，我的搜索词都是空白的。我认为我的代码是我的，我可以发布它，但是MPLAB-X生成的MaFIX文件和项目文件完全是另一回事。如果我能够将它们发布到GITHUB，这样有人可以克隆这个项目，将项目导入MPLAB-X，而不需要任何乱七八糟的东西来构建它，那就太好了。我会继续搜索。我确实找到了一个GITHUB项目，其中包含了一个MPLAB-X文件：HTPSP//GIST.GITHUBCOM/ZEHA/599 9375。
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 I been searching for some sort of answer but my search terms so far have drawn a blank. I consider my code to be mine, and I can publish it, but the Makefile generate by MPLAB-X and the project files are another matter entirely. It would be great if I was able to publish them to github so that somebody could just clone the project, import the project into MPLAB-X, without any messing around and build it. I'll keep searching. I did find a github project which contains a gitignore file for MPLAB-X: https://gist.github.com/zeha/5999375 |
|
|
|
|
|
请开一张支持票，我对答案很感兴趣。
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 Please do open a support ticket, I am quite interested in the answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
所以我开了一张关于这个问题的支持票。是时候让我想知道谁在自动生成的Mag文件上拥有版权？好的，IDE确实生成了它，但是我按下了所有按钮，选择的文件名和决定其输出的选项。我对法律问题感到好奇，这不是一个好地方。很快，当我听到一些回应时，我会让你知道。
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 So I have opened a support ticket on the subject. Mean time it did get me to wondering who owns copy right on an auto-generated Makefile? OK the IDE did generate it, but I pushed all the buttons, selected file names and options which dictated its output. I've wondered into legal questions and that's not a good place to be. Soon as I hear some response I'll let ye know. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言，加入小组>>
5238 浏览 9 评论
2028 浏览 8 评论
1950 浏览 10 评论
请问是否能把一个ADC值转换成两个字节用来设置PWM占空比？
3204 浏览 3 评论
请问电源和晶体值之间有什么关系吗？PIC在正常条件下运行4MHz需要多少电压？
2253 浏览 5 评论
778浏览 1评论
666浏览 1评论
有偿咨询，关于MPLAB X IPE烧录PIC32MX所遇到的问题
595浏览 1评论
PIC Kit3出现目标设备ID(00000000)与预期的设备ID(02c20000)不匹配。是什么原因
677浏览 0评论
576浏览 0评论
/6 
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 （电路图） 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证：合字B2-20210191
工商网监
湘ICP备2023018690号
1546
评论
淘帖
1215
