WebPack到期

你好
您是否尝试过登录xilinx网站登录并获得新许可？
http://www.xilinx.com/tools/webpack.htm



以下为原文

Hi
 
have you tried going back onto the xilinx entitalment page logging in and getting a new licence ?
 
http://www.xilinx.com/tools/webpack.htm
 

我今天使用许可证配置管理器获取新许可证，但仍然收到相同的警告。
之后，我用文本编辑器打开了许可证文件C：。Xilinx  webpack.lic，并注意到我有一套2010.04和两套2010.10。
我假设在安装11.5更新时添加了第一个2010.10集，而今天我获得新许可时刚刚添加了第二个。
在管理器中对搜索顺序上的许可条目进行排序，显示2010.04条目首先被检查，然后是2010.10条目。
只是为了好玩，我备份了文件并删除了除了一个2010.10之外的所有文件，警告就消失了！
我想，虽然2010.04条目仍然有效，但它们会与警告一起使用，当它们到期时，将使用2010.10条目。
可怕的警告信息。
布鲁斯



以下为原文

I used the license configuration manager to get a new license today but still got the same warning.
 
After that, I opened the license file C:.Xilinxwebpack.lic with a text editor and noted that I had one set for 2010.04 and two for 2010.10. I assume the first 2010.10 set was added when I installed the 11.5 update and the second was just added when I got a new license today.  Sorting the license entries on search order, in the manager, showed that the 2010.04 entries were checked first then the 2010.10 entries.
 
Just for fun, I backed up the file and deleted all but one 2010.10 set and the warning went away!
 
I guess, while the 2010.04 entries are still valid, they are used with the warning and, when they expire, the 2010.10 entries would be used.

Scary warning message.
 
Bruce

如果他们简单地放弃了所有BS许可废话并且只是使所有工具可用，那将是很好的。
我们需要他们在他们的IC中设计并且他们想要销售FPGA，对吧？
为什么要设置障碍？
为什么不放弃工具并保持支持流量，开始收取支持费用？
那些需要大量手持的人只需支付费用。
他们花在许可支持上的所有时间和金钱都将消失。



以下为原文

It would be nice if they simply dropped all the BS licensing crap and just made all the tools available, period.
We need them to design in their ICs and they DO want to sell FPGAs, right?
 
Why put up a barrier? Why not give away the tools and to keep the support traffic down, start charging for support?
Those people who need lots of hand-holding would simply pay for it. All the time and money they spend on licensing support would disappear.

WebPACK 12.1现在可供下载和安装。
--------------------------------------------------
-----------------------不要忘记回答，kudo，并接受为解决方案.-------------
--------------------------------------------------
----------



以下为原文

WebPACK 12.1 is now available to download and install.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t forget to reply, kudo, and accept as solution.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

akleica写道：
如果他们简单地放弃了所有BS许可废话并且只是使所有工具可用，那将是很好的。
我们需要他们在他们的IC中设计并且他们想要销售FPGA，对吧？
为什么要设置障碍？
为什么不放弃工具并保持支持流量，开始收取支持费用？
那些需要大量手持的人只需支付费用。
他们花在许可支持上的所有时间和金钱都将消失。
向合唱团讲道！
特别是关于充电支持的观点，这非常有意义。
----------------------------是的，我这样做是为了谋生。



以下为原文

 

akleica wrote:
It would be nice if they simply dropped all the BS licensing crap and just made all the tools available, period.
We need them to design in their ICs and they DO want to sell FPGAs, right?
 
Why put up a barrier? Why not give away the tools and to keep the support traffic down, start charging for support?
Those people who need lots of hand-holding would simply pay for it. All the time and money they spend on licensing support would disappear.

Preaching to the choir! Especially your point about charging for support, which makes perfect sense.
 
----------------------------Yes, I do this for a living.

我花了4个小时下载并安装Webpack 12.1。
然后获得了许可证。
所以我认为。
尽管有这样的信息： -
“感谢您注册ISE Design Suite产品。已安装相应的FLEXnet许可证密钥，现在可以使用该软件了。” 
谎言！
该应用程序仍然认为我没有许可证。
这一次浪费废话发生在evey年。
它是否必须如此痛苦。
我想知道其他FPGA制造商的用户是否遭受同样的**哔哔**。
戴维德



以下为原文

I spent 4 hours downloading and installing Webpack 12.1. Then obtained a license. So I thought.
 
Despite the message:-
 
 
 
"Thank you for registering your ISE Design Suite product.  The  appropriate FLEXnet license key has been installed and the software is  now ready for use."
 
LIES! The application still thinks I have no license.
 
This time wasting crap happens evey year. Does it have to be so painfull. I would like to know if users of other FPGA manufacturers suffer the same **bleep**.
 
Dafydd

你好
回答你的嘟嘟问题。
是。
我与4个不同的FPGA供应商合作， 
并没有任何工具相处，它们都有功能。
我最终为每个供应商和每个新版本使用不同的虚拟机，
我只运行我需要的那个，但它确实存了很多问题。
OH BTW：FlexLM似乎总是引起问题/路径名称等等。
一切都可以克服，但我只是放弃了在一台机器上使用不同工具的斗争。



以下为原文

Hi
 
in answer to your beep question.
 
Yes.
 
I work with 4 different FPGA vendors,
   and none of the tools get along, they all have features.
 
I end up using different virtual machines for each vendor, and each new version,
 
I only run the one I need, but it does save a lot of problems.
 
OH BTW: FlexLM always seems to be causing problems / path names et all.
 
All can be overcome, but I just gave up the fight to have different tools on one machine.
 
 

链接已解决至少其中一个问题的另一个线程。
http://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Installation/Why-does-the-webpack-issue-license-expiration-warnings/m-p/69612
干杯，
BT



以下为原文