完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你，还能领取20积分哦， 立即完善>
3天内不再提示
电子发烧友论坛|
我正在使用您的34972A产品运行BenchVue的DAQ应用程序。
不幸的是，我在BenchVue中遇到计算通道的警报指示灯问题。 例如，为通道101设置高/低警报，然后通过将常数0添加到通道101来创建通道901，基本上复制通道101.在通道901上设置完全相同的高/低警报。 在101上，我在图形设置窗口中创建了一个警报灯指示灯。 有趣的是，这些灯在相同的测量值下不会照亮相同的颜色。 我注意到原始测量通道101按设计工作，但是，只要测量值低于高警报限制，通道901就显示低警报灯。 一旦值达到HIGH ALARM限制，灯就会切换到HIGH ALARM颜色。 从不在适当的测量范围内，NO ALARM指示灯会亮起。 请帮忙 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 I am running the DAQ App of BenchVue with your 34972A product. Unfortunately, I am having issues with my alarm light indicators of computed channels in BenchVue. For example, a High/Low alarm is set up for channel 101, and then channel 901 is created by adding the constant 0 to channel 101, essentially duplicating channel 101. With the exact same High/Low alarm set up on channel 901 as is on 101, I created a alarm light indicator in the graphical setup window. Interestingly, these lights do not illuminate the same color at the same measured value. I have noticed that the original measurement channel 101 works as designed, however, channel 901 displays a LOW ALARM light as long as the measured value is below the HIGH ALARM limit. Once the value hits the HIGH ALARM limit, the light switches to the HIGH ALARM color. Never in the appropriate measurement range does the NO ALARM light illuminate. Please help 
0
|
|
相关推荐
3个回答
|
|
|
嗨Rod，这是一个已知的缺陷，正在我们的下一个版本中修复。
这有多重要？ 如果需求是紧急和关键的，我可能能够通过修补程序解决问题。 下限测试在非计算通道上工作正常，并且上限测试似乎适用于计算通道。 你能解决这个限制吗？ 布赖恩 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hi Rod, This is a known defect that is being fixed in our next release. How critical is this? If the need is urgent and critical, I might be able to get a hotfix through to fix the problem. The low limit test works fine on non-computed channels, and the high limit test appears to work on computed channels. Can you work around this limitation? Brian |
|
|
|
|
|
感谢Brian的回复。 我已经给你发了一条信息，其中的要点是我希望这会在下周左右开始工作。 我能想出的唯一工作就是创建2个计算通道，一个用于下限，一个用于上限。 有趣的是，我不得不使用接近警报极限一半的值来让它去旅行。 例如，如果我希望下限为4个单位，我将闹钟设置为2，并且警报灯指示4个单位的错误....谢谢，棒 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Thank you for your reply Brian. I have sent you a message, and the gist of it was that I would like this to be working in the next week or so. The only work around I could come up with was creating 2 computed channels, one for the low limit, and one for the high limit. Interestingly, I had to use a value close to one half the alarm limit I was looking for to get it to trip. For example, if I wanted the lower limit to be at 4 units, I set the alarm to trip at 2, and the alarm lights indicated an error at 4 units.... Thanks, Rod |
|
|
|
|
yx19911127 发表于 2018-9-11 09:06 嗨罗德，除了这个论坛的人之外，我还没有收到你的任何消息。 请确保您已将其发送至keysight.com的bv_support。 布赖恩 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hi Rod, I have not received any messages from you other than those in this forum. Please make sure you sent it to bv_support at keysight.com. Brian |
|
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言，加入小组>>
1299 浏览 0 评论
2379 浏览 1 评论
2199 浏览 1 评论
2068 浏览 5 评论
2955 浏览 3 评论
1147浏览 1评论
关于Keysight x1149 Boundary Scan Analyzer
761浏览 0评论
N5230C用“CALC:MARK:BWID？”获取Bwid,Cent,Q,Loss失败，请问大佬们怎么解决呀
954浏览 0评论
1300浏览 0评论
/7 
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 （电路图） 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证：合字B2-20210191
工商网监
湘ICP备2023018690号
2339
评论
淘帖
3223
