推荐用于新设计的SPWF01？

嗨流，
SPWF01仍然推荐用于新设计。 SPWF04是新的，更强大，可能（预期！）更昂贵。
从每个角度看（自下而上），我们有：SPWF01Sx.21（没有额外闪光），SPWF01Sx.11（带额外闪光）和SPWF04Sx（顶级）。它们涵盖了不同的用例：
- 如果你不需要OTA，永远不会使用01.11＆amp; 04
- 如果你不需要WPS，永远不会使用01.11和01.21
- 如果你想保留外部MCU，永远不会使用04
显然，使用SPWF04你拥有一切！但是，如果你不想支付一些从未使用过的东西，那么SPWF01仍然存在。并且，是的，路线图中的更新是为了满足云中的新需求。
无论如何，在我看来，WPS和WPA-Enterprise提供了很大的优势，而不仅仅是IPv6 ......
再见
杰瑞



以下为原文




Hi Flow,
SPWF01 is still recommended for new designs. SPWF04 is new, is more powerful, and probably (expected!) is more expensive.
From every point if view (bottom-up), we have: SPWF01Sx.21 (w/o extra flash), SPWF01Sx.11 (w/ extra flash), and SPWF04Sx (top level). They cover different use cases:
- if you don't need OTA, will never use 01.11 & 04
- if you don't need WPS, will never use 01.11 and 01.21
- if you want to keep external MCU, will never use 04
Obviously, using SPWF04 you have everything! But, if you don't want to pay for something that will be never used, SPWF01 is still there. And, yes, an update is in roadmap to cover new needs from the cloud.
Anyway, in my point of view, a big plus is provided by WPS and WPA-Enterprise, more than IPv6...
Ciao
jerry

嗨，杰里，
非常感谢你的详细解答。
一些问题：
- 如果你不需要OTA，永远不会使用01.11＆amp; 04
在SPWF04数据表中是OTA listentd的功能。
- 如果你想保留外部MCU，永远不会使用04
如果我有外置MCU，为什么我永远不会使用SPWF04？
谢谢。
干杯，
流



以下为原文




Hi Jerry,
thank you very much for your detailed answer.
Some questions:
- if you don't need OTA, will never use 01.11 & 04
In the SPWF04 data sheet is the feature OTA listetd.
- if you want to keep external MCU, will never use 04
Why should I never use the SPWF04 if I have an external MCU?
Thx.
Cheers,
Flow

再见，
- OTA需要一个临时存储区域，由嵌入式（04）或扩展（01.11）设备提供。如果不需要，请使用01.21;
- 04最大的优势是可以在没有外部MCU的情况下工作。无主机模式，由MicroPython引擎提供支持。
大多数客户不需要IPv6，OTA，WPS等。他们使用原始套接字开发更高级别的协议。在这种情况下，请使用01.21。
Ĵ



以下为原文




Ciao,
- OTA requires a temporary storage area, provided by embedded (04) or extended (01.11) devices. If not required, use 01.21;
- 04 biggest advantage is the possibility to work without an external MCU. Host-less mode, powered by MicroPython engine.
Most customers don't need IPv6, OTA, WPS, etc. They develop higher level protocols using raw sockets. In this case, use 01.21.
j

嗨，杰里，
感谢您的进一步解释。
BR，
流



以下为原文




Hi Jerry,
thanks for further explanations.
BR,
Flow

嗨Gerardo，
我们有一个客户使用
SPWF04最近发现这个模块在待机模式下运行时会吸收大于1mA的电流而不是数据表中提到的uA电平。他们之前使用的是SPWF01，但没有看到这个问题。我是否知道SPWF04是否可以作为SPWF01的兼容替代品，硬件重新设计或AT评论设置的任何通知/提示？谢谢。



以下为原文




Hi Gerardo,
We have a customer using
SPWF04 recently and found this module when running at standby mode would draw around >1mA current rather than uA level mentioned in the datasheet. They were using SPWF01 before and did not see this problem. May I know if SPWF04 could be a compatible replacement for SPWF01, any notice/tips for Hardware redesign or AT comment settings? Thanks.

不，这是......



以下为原文




No, it is...