当尝试使用Impact对设备进行编程时，将S25FL128S附加到Spartan-6上，工具报告设备已超过分配的时间

你好，
您能提供您使用的设备的完整零件号（如S25FL128SAGMFIF1）吗？
最好的问候，
尊礼



     以下为原文
  Hello,
 
Could you provide the complete part number of the device (like S25FL128SAGMFI001) you are using?
 
Best Regards,
Takahiro

BGA封装…S25FL128SABBHZI00



     以下为原文
  BGA package... S25FL128SAGBHIZ00

您使用的部分是增强的安全模型，默认情况下启用写保护。
S25FL-S—KBA223 257后缀“Z0”和“Z1”的意义
为了禁用保护，需要一个特定的命令序列，并且Xilinx影响不支持该命令序列。请用S25FL128SABBHI300代替普通模型。
最好的问候，
尊礼



     以下为原文
  The part you are using is the enhanced security model which the write protect is enabled by default.
Meaning of Suffixes “Z0” and “Z1” for S25FL-S – KBA223257
 
To disable the protection, a specific command sequence is required and the Xilinx impact does not support that. Please try with the normal model like S25FL128SAGBHI300 instead.
 
Best Regards,
Takahiro

你好，
我试图编程S25FL128LAGMF010，也使用冲击和斯巴达-6。我不认为我的Flash是一个高安全性的模型，但我也遇到了同样的问题。错误：影响：2525–1：设备超出分配时间。
我已经改变了我的环境变量，跳过ID检查。我甚至把我的影响版本降到13.4，如AR 52747：冲击142/3/4-斯巴达-3E-“设备超过了分配的时间”当运行间接程序时失败……（我知道这不是Cypess或SpTAN-6，但是我还是试了一下）。
这是一个新的设计，所以我一直在比较不同的闪存IC。与WiBand项目几乎完全相同，但如果可能的话，我宁愿坚持柏树。有人能提供其他提示吗？
谢谢您！
罗伯特



     以下为原文
  Hello,
 
I am trying to program the S25FL128LAGMFI010, also using iMPACT and a Spartan-6.  I don't think my Flash is a high-security model, but I am getting the same problem. "ERROR:iMPACT:2525 - '1': Device has exceeded the allocated time."
 
I have changed my Environment Variable to skip the ID check. I even down-graded my version of iMPACT to 13.4, as per AR# 52747: iMPACT 14.2/3/4 - Spartan-3E - "Device has exceeded the allocated time" failure when running indirect program… (I know this is not for Cypess or Spartan-6, but I gave it a try anyway).
 
This is for a new design, so I have been comparing different flash ICs. The almost-identical counterparts from Winbond program well, but I would rather stick with Cypress if possible. Can anyone provide any other hints?
 
Thank you!
Robert

嗨，罗伯特，
当我验证了S25FL064的影响14.7和SP601斯巴达6板，我得到以下消息在控制台窗口。
哪一步你会犯错误？
您在选择的附件SPI/BPI“窗口中选择了哪个零件号？
由于您使用的是S25FL128L，您可以选择S25FL128S或S25FL129P。
最好的问候，
尊礼



     以下为原文
  Hi Robert,
 
When I verified that the S25FL064L with iMPACT 14.7 and SP601 Spartan 6 board, I got the following messages in iMPACT console window.

Which step you got iMACT ERROR?
And what part number do you select in the Select Attached SPI/BPI" window?
Since you are using S25FL128L, you can select S25FL128S or S25FL129P.

 
Best Regards,
Takahiro

嗨，Takahiro，
当我回到办公室时，我会再看一遍，但我马上看到一件事：它看起来像是在四路SPI模式下与Flash通信。我只使用单一的SPI。这会有什么区别吗？
谢谢！



     以下为原文
  Hi Takahiro,
 
I will look again when I get back in the office, but one thing I see right away: it looks like you are communicating with the flash in quad-SPI mode.  I am using only single-SPI.  Should that make a difference?
 
Thanks!

这是我的控制台输出：



     以下为原文
  Here is my Console output:

嗨，罗伯特，
你的影响版本是什么？你尝试过V147吗？
您在选择的附件SPI/BPI“窗口中选择了哪个零件号？
最好的问候，
尊礼



     以下为原文
  Hi Robert,
 
What is your iMPACT version? Did you try with v14.7?
And what part number do you select in the Select Attached SPI/BPI" window?
 
Best Regards,
Takahiro

是的，我们用了14.7。
我们已经尝试了S25FL128S和S25FL129P设置。
这是控制台的另一个截图：
我可以使用WWBOND W25Q16JVSSIQ，它应该是（？）几乎在所有方面相同，电（不是容量）。我可以和那个芯片一起做我的产品，但是困扰我为什么柏树应该与众不同。它警告我，也许我有什么错。
谢谢！



     以下为原文
  Yes, we have been using 14.7.
 
And we have tried both the S25FL128S and S25FL129P settings.
 
Here is another screenshot of the console:

 
I am able to use the Winbond W25Q16JVSSIQ, which should be(?) identical in almost all respects, electrically (not capacity). I can just go with that chip for my product, but it bothers me why the Cypress should be different. It warns me that maybe I have something else wrong.
 
Thanks!