在90天试用期间许可证管理器是否正常工作

好吧，对我感到羞耻，我对Win2016主机做了更好的检查，服务器没有连接到许可证服务器。
一旦连接，它将计数器减少一个（现在为127）。
现在我有两个问题：
- 在主机内我通过HyperV运行一些VM。
它们是RemoteFX连接的。
为什么每次登录并使用GPU（Chrome实验测试）时许可证计数器都不会减少？
- 与上述相同，但通过DDA分配GPU，许可证计数不会更改。
- 有没有更好的方法来设置和检查从主机到许可证服务器的此连接？
Nvidia CtrlPanel只能从控制台运行，而不能从RemoteDesktop会话运行。
谢谢， 
一个。



以下为原文

Ok, shame on me, I did a better check on my Win2016 Host and the server was not connected to the license server. Once connected it decreased the counter by one (now 127).
Now I have two questions:
- inside the host I am running some VM through HyperV. They are RemoteFX connected. Why doesn't the license counter decrease each time I log in and use the GPU (Chrome Experiments  test) ?
- same as above but with a GPU assigned via DDA, license counts doesn't change.
- is there a better way to set and check this connection from the Host to the license server? Nvidia CtrlPanel can be run only from a console and not from a RemoteDesktop session.

thanks,
a.

Alaxa，
目前，在每个会话的会话中，许可证服务器中不会​​跟踪RDSH会话。
Windows 2016 VM（DDA）本身将检出许可证，但后续远程会话不会。



以下为原文

Alaxa,


RDSH sessions are not currently tracked in the license server on a session per session basis. The Windows 2016 VM (DDA) itself will check out a license but the subsequent remote sessions will not.

好的，很高兴知道，但我仍然没有得到它。
我设置了一个mini-VDI环境（10个内置RemoteFX的虚拟机），所有内容都放在同一台机器上。
我预计每次客户端连接到VM时许可证编号都会下降，但是数字仍然相同，而是来自HyperV主机（在之前的测试中，它的行为类似于RemoteDesktopServiceHost）
明天试用期将到期，我们仍然不知道要求的许可证数量和数量。
谢谢， 
一个。



以下为原文

Ok, good to know, but I still don't get it.
I set up a mini-VDI environment (10 VMs with RemoteFX inside), everything into the same machine. I expected the license number decresead each time a client connected to a VM, but instead the number is still the same, the one got from the  HyperV host (which in the previous test acted like a RemoteDesktopServiceHost)
tomorrow the trial will expire and we still don't know what and how many licenses ask for.

Thanks,
a.

无论您的用户使用的是VDI，RDSH还是仅使用已发布的应用，许可均为每个并发用户。
当它变得有趣时，就是当你决定如何提供这些资源时（因此A，B＆amp; Q变体）。
如果您需要更清晰：
http://images.nvidia.com/content/pdf/grid/guides/GRID-Packaging-and-Licensing-Guide.pdf
问候



以下为原文

Whether your users are on VDI, RDSH or just using Published Apps, licenses are per concurrent user.

Where it becomes a little more interesting, is when you decide how you want to deliver those resources (hence the A, B & Q variants).

Page 10 if you need more clarity:


http://images.nvidia.com/content/pdf/grid/guides/GRID-Packaging-and-Licensing-Guide.pdf


Regards

亲爱的BJones， 
我想你指的是这部分：
每个用户都需要CCU许可证
在任何给定时间访问或使用该软件，无论是否有活动连接
维护虚拟桌面或会话。
我们的测试涉及3到4个不同的用户同时连接到
1）相同的RDSH服务器（从LicenseManager获得一个许可证）
2）不同的虚拟机进入同一个VDI系统（从LicenseManager获得一个许可证）
我认为每次用户连接上述资源之一时，LicenseManager都会删除一个许可证。
也许术语“USER”意味着“连接到licenseManager的设备”，在这种情况下当然是相同的服务器。
所以问题只是购买了多少个CCU。
谢谢， 
一个。



以下为原文

Dear BJones,
I guess you are referring to this part:
A CCU license is required for every user who is
accessing or using the software at any given time, whether or not an active connection to
the virtualized desktop or session is maintained.

our test involved 3 or 4 different users connected at the same time to
1) same RDSH server (one license got from LicenseManager)
2) different VMs into the same VDI system (one license got from LicenseManager)

I thought that each time a user connects to one of the above resources one license is dropped by LicenseManager. Perhaps the term "USER"  is meant as "device connected to the licenseManager", which in this case is of course the same server.
So the question is only how many CCUs to buy.

thanks,
a.

答案相同。
您有多少用户将连接到GRID GPU提供的资源？
...
例如：5个Windows 7工作站+ 5个RDSH桌面会话+ 5个用户启动已发布应用= 15个许可证。
关于服务器上的许可证计数，使用VDI，许可证是从许可证服务器分配的（至少在我使用XenDesktop时）。
有了RDSH，我想在这个阶段有一点信任。
但是，我确信许可证服务器将在适当的时候发展为考虑所有连接方法。



以下为原文

Same answer.

How many users do you have that will connect to a resource provided by a GRID GPU? ...

Eg: 5x Windows 7 workstations + 5x RDSH desktop sessions + 5x users launching Published Apps = 15 licenses.

Regarding the license count on the server, with VDI, licenses are allocated from the license server (at least they are when I use XenDesktop). With RDSH, I guess there's a little trust involved at this stage. However, I'm sure that the license server will evolve to take all connection methods into consideration in due course.

好吧，即使现在许可证管理员似乎不计算它们，我也会选择同时连接的用户（大约30个）。
谢谢，
一个。



以下为原文

Ok, so even if now the license manager seems not to count them, I'll choose as many will be the users that will be connected simultaneously (around 30).

Thanks,
a.

是的，但如上所述，这是（在此阶段）需要一点信任的地方。
如果您知道（例如）65个并发会话访问该平台，则“应该”在许可证服务器上提供65个许可证。
这显然是容易被滥用的，因为有那些会利用这一点，所以我相信不久之后NVIDIA会修改许可证服务器，以便“信任”不再是等式的一部分。
正如nvjcc上面提到的那样，“目前没有跟踪RDSH会话”。
但是，我想它不久就会......
问候



以下为原文

Yes, but as said, this is where (at this stage) a little trust is required. If you know that you'll have (for example) 65 Concurrent sessions accessing the platform, you "should" have 65 licenses available on the license server.

This is obviously open to abuse, as there are those out there that will take advantage of this, so I'm sure it won't be long before NVIDIA modify the license server so that "trust" is no longer part of the equation.

As nvjcc mentions above, "RDSH sessions are not currently tracked". However, I'd imagine it won't be long before they are...

Regards

None


以下为原文

Well,
thanks for the explanation. Just one more quick question, if you are entitled for an answer.
If we bought 30 vPC licenses (711-5GRID-VPCS-ED1) are we able to upgrade to another type (711-5GRID-VWSS-ED1) within the same year paying only the difference? Or should we buy another NEW license and trash the old one?

Thanks,
a.

你好alexa，
遗憾的是，我们目前没有许可证的升级途径。
那说你需要购买新的许可证。
我想在Bens许可说明中添加一个补充。
正如您可能已经看到的那样，如果您购买vWS许可证，您将在许可门户中“另外”获得vApp许可证。
因此，在上面的场景中，如果您有5个用户为同一用户提供客户端操作系统VDI + 5 RDSH会话，则可以使用购买的vWS或vPC许可证。
问候
西蒙



以下为原文

Hi alexa,

unfortunately we currently don't have an upgrade path for licensing. That said you would need to buy new licenses.
I want to add an addition to Bens licensing explanation. As you might have seen if you buy for example  a vWS license you will get a vApp license in the license portal "in addition".
So in the scenario above if you have 5 users with client OS VDI + 5 RDSH sessions for the same users you are fine with the bought vWS or vPC license.

Regards

Simon

谢谢西蒙
是的，对不起，如果不清楚的话。
我试图指出，无论你如何连接，许可都是按照CCU，谢谢澄清:-)
我昨晚和GRID产品经理谈过，除了Simons的反馈，他们的立场是你需要联系NVIDIA销售代表，他们会解决这个问题。
但是，首先订购正确的许可证要容易得多。
上面列出的文件包含了做出明智决定的所有适当信息。
问候



以下为原文

Thanks Simon

Yes, sorry if that wasn't clear. I was trying to make the point that regardless of how you connect, the licensing is per CCU, thanks for clarifying :-)

I've spoken to a GRID Product Manager last night and their stance in addition to Simons feedback is that you would need to contact an NVIDIA Sales Rep, and they will work through the issue with you. However, it's far easier to order the correct licenses in the first place. The document listed above has all the appropriate information for making an informed decision.

Regards

西蒙的回答很经典，我看后通过测试解决了一些不解的问题！赞。