完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
最近关于N9912A上缺少波导校准设备的讨论使我想知道是否可以通过创建基于*数据的*校准工具包文件解决问题,如此处所述http://na.support.keysight.com/
pna / dbcal.html如果首先计算反射标准的S参数,保存在数据文件中,并且在CalKitEditor软件中打开该数据文件,它*可能*可以+ fudge +波导校准。 我知道有人想在N9912A中进行波导校准,如果N9912A支持cal kit文件中的数据,可能会尝试创建这样的文件。 但在浪费我的时间之前,我想知道它是否有任何工作机会。 我怀疑N9912A的校准程序很有可能无法处理基于数据的文件。 戴夫 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 The recent discussion about the lack of a waveguide calibration facility on the N9912A got me wondering if one could work around the problem by creating a *data based* calibration kit file, like described here http://na.support.keysight.com/pna/dbcal.html If the S-parameters of the reflection standard were first computed, saved in a data file, and that data file opened in the CalKitEditor software, it *maybe* possible to +fudge+ a waveguide calibration. I know someone that wants waveguide calibration in an N9912A, and might attempt to create such a file if the N9912A would support the data in the cal kit file. But before wasting my time, I'd like to know if it has any chance of working. I suspect there's a good chance the N9912A's calibration routine could not handle a data based file. Dave |
|
相关推荐
2个回答
|
|
我能够将基于数据的校准套件(客户已创建)加载到我的N9912A上并运行OSL校准程序。
我实际上没有带有正确数据的校准套件来测试校准的有效性,但它经历了整个过程而没有任何错误。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 I was able to load a data-based cal kit ( a customer had created ) onto my N9912A and run through the OSL cal routine. I don't actually have a cal kit with the correct data to test the validity of the calibration, but it went through the process without any errors. |
|
|
|
dsgdadsad 发表于 2018-9-24 06:19 > {quote:title = am95405写道:} {quote}>我能够将基于数据的校准工具包(客户已创建)加载到我的N9912A上并运行OSL校准程序。 我实际上没有带有正确数据的校准套件来测试校准的有效性,但它经历了整个过程而没有任何错误。 谢谢Afsi。 知道这很有用。 我总是可以计算校准套件的S参数,例如来自多项式的85054B N cal套件,并创建一个基于数据的套件,看它是否给出与使用85054B的多项式版本相同的结果。 至少我知道这不会完全浪费时间,因为我认为如果FieldFox无法理解基于数据的校准套件那将是徒劳的。 戴夫 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 > {quote:title=am95405 wrote:}{quote} > I was able to load a data-based cal kit ( a customer had created ) onto my N9912A and run through the OSL cal routine. I don't actually have a cal kit with the correct data to test the validity of the calibration, but it went through the process without any errors. Thank you Afsi. That's useful to know. I could always calculate the S-parameters for a cal kit such as an 85054B N cal kit from the polynomial, and create a data based kit to see if it gives the same results as using the polynomial version of the 85054B. At least I know it would not be a complete waste of time, as I was thinking it would be a futile exercise if the FieldFox could not understand a data-based cal kit. Dave |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
1221 浏览 0 评论
2346 浏览 1 评论
2155 浏览 1 评论
2021 浏览 5 评论
2900 浏览 3 评论
964浏览 1评论
关于Keysight x1149 Boundary Scan Analyzer
700浏览 0评论
N5230C用“CALC:MARK:BWID?”获取Bwid,Cent,Q,Loss失败,请问大佬们怎么解决呀
801浏览 0评论
1223浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-11-22 10:29 , Processed in 1.360059 second(s), Total 79, Slave 62 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号