是德科技
直播中

李伟

7年用户 1503经验值
私信 关注
[问答]

如何使用85052C套件校准N9925a?

我们有一台N9925a FieldFox网络分析仪,使用1米电线(3.5毫米端口)时校准结果似乎很好。我这样操作:1。按'测量'按钮,改为's21'2。'BW' -
--- 1khz 3.'测量设置'--------开始Frq 1GHz停止Frq 6GHZ 4.'cal'------------- quickcal step1 -----
---测量步骤2 ---------跳过步骤3 ---------跳过步骤4 ---------使用85052c套件将端口1连接到端口2。
检查校准结果,我将OPEN套件(从85052C)连接到端口1,将测量更改为s11,并检查史密斯图表。
当我使用1米电线时,它运作良好。
使用6米时,结果很糟糕。
所以我想使用机械校准,但没有'85052c'选项。
我尝试使用DataLink编辑新的CalKit,但我找不到文件'85052c.xml'。
有没有人在这个领域有经验?
〜感谢名单

以上来自于谷歌翻译


     以下为原文

  We have a  N9925a FieldFox Network Analyzer and calibration result seems to be good while using 1m electric wire (3.5mm port) .I operate like this:
1. Press 'measure' button and change to 's21'
2. 'BW' -----  1khz
3. 'measure set up' --------start Frq 1GHz    stop Frq 6GHZ
4.'cal' -------------quickcal
   step1 --------measure
   step2---------skip
   step3---------skip
   step4---------using 85052c kit to connect port 1 to port 2.
5. while examining cal result,i connect OPEN kit (from 85052C ) to port 1,change the measure to s11 ,and check the smith chart.

It works well,when i use 1m wire. While using 6m's, the result is bad.

So i want to use the mechanical cal, but there is't have the option '85052c'. And i tried DataLink to edit a new CalKit, but i can't find the file '85052c.xml'. Is there anyone has experience in this field?

Thanx~   
附件

回帖(4)

陈建华

2018-12-12 17:11:47

就像下次参加FY一样...... FieldFox有自己的论坛,你可以在这里得到更快的结果......虽然Dave在这个问题上非常快。
FieldFox论坛:网络分析仪 - 手持式分析仪

以上来自于谷歌翻译


     以下为原文

  Just as an FY for next time....FieldFox has its own forum where you may get quicker results...although Dave was pretty quick on this one.
FieldFox forum:  Network Analyzers - Handheld Analyzers
举报

李伟

2018-12-12 17:24:24
引用: 胡bbs2 发表于 2018-12-12 19:45
就像下次参加FY一样...... FieldFox有自己的论坛,你可以在这里得到更快的结果......虽然Dave在这个问题上非常快。
FieldFox论坛:网络分析仪 - 手持式分析仪

好的,我也在那里发布了。
谢谢〜

以上来自于谷歌翻译


     以下为原文

  OK, I've posted there too. thanks~
举报

李青

2018-12-12 17:36:03

> {quote:title = chirsMC写道:} {quote}>我打开了URL,并且有一个85052C.ckt文件。
DataLink无法将此文件发送到FieldFox。
chirsMC。
正如jvall所说,其他论坛可能是最好的地方。
我相信Afsi或她的一位同事会帮助你。
我发现FieldFox的支持很棒。
对不起,我可能会给你一些PNA系列的链接,这些链接有.ckt文件的链接。
我只是打算你看到85052C的.html文件中的系数与85052B相同。
我不打算你下载我应该清楚的.ckt文件。
如果你看看我给你的.html链接,比如http://na.tm.agilent.com/pna/caldefs/PNA/85052C.htm(你有的精密TRL 85052C套件)http:// na。
tm.agilent.com/pna/caldefs/PNA/85052B.htm(标准26.5 GHz套件)http://na.tm.agilent.com/pna/caldefs/PNA/85052D.htm(经济型26.5 GHz 85052D)
http://na.tm.agilent.com/pna/caldefs/PNA/85033DE.htm(过时的6 GHz 85033D和当前的9 GHz 85033E)并仔细阅读,你会看到开路和短路的系数是相同的
所有的工具包。
对于开路(公母和母),C0 = 49.433,C1 = -310.13,C2 = 23.168,C3 = -0.15969,偏移延迟= 29.2 ps,偏移Zo = 50欧姆,偏移损耗= 2.2 G Ohm / s对于短路
(男性和女性)L0 = 2.0765,L1 = -108.54,L2 = 2.1705,L3 = -0.01,偏移延迟= 31.8 ps,偏移Zo = 50欧姆,偏移损耗= 2.36 G Ohm / s因此如果更专业
TRL 85052C套件不在FieldFox的固件中,您可以考虑选择85033E(我知道它有,因为我有那个套件)或85052B,我相当自信会在那里。
这就是我想要做的一点 - 抱歉,如果我困惑你。
85033E可能是一个不错的选择,因为你不会被提示你不必要的东西,比如你在85052C套件中没有的滑动负载。
如果选择85052B,则在选择负载时需要选择宽带负载。
如果85052C不在FieldFox的固件中,也许您可​​以在*其他论坛*上建议它在以后的固件版本中添加。
如果我困惑你,请再次抱歉。
戴夫

以上来自于谷歌翻译


     以下为原文

  > {quote:title=chirsMC wrote:}{quote}

> I've open the URL, and there is a 85052C.ckt file. DataLink can't send this file to the FieldFox.

chirsMC.

As jvall said, the other forum is probably the best place. I'm sure Afsi or one of her colleagues will help you. I found the support on the FieldFox excellent. 

Sorry, I may have confused you by giving you some links for the PNA series, which had links to .ckt files. I was only intending you to see the coefficients in the .html files for the 85052C were the same as the 85052B. I was not intending you to download the the .ckt files I should have made that clear. If you look at the .html links I gave you, such as 

http://na.tm.agilent.com/pna/caldefs/PNA/85052C.htm (the precision TRL 85052C kit you have)
http://na.tm.agilent.com/pna/caldefs/PNA/85052B.htm (the standard 26.5 GHz kit)
http://na.tm.agilent.com/pna/caldefs/PNA/85052D.htm (the economy 26.5 GHz 85052D)
http://na.tm.agilent.com/pna/caldefs/PNA/85033DE.htm (obsolete 6 GHz 85033D and current 9 GHz 85033E)

and read carefully, you will see the coefficients of the opens and shorts are the same for all the kits. 

For the opens (both male and female)
C0=49.433, C1=-310.13, C2=23.168, C3=-0.15966, offset delay = 29.2 ps, offset Zo=50 Ohms, offset loss = 2.2 G Ohm/s

For the shorts (both male and female)
L0=2.0765, L1=-108.54, L2=2.1705, L3=-0.01, offset delay = 31.8 ps, offset Zo=50 Ohms, offset loss = 2.36 G Ohm/s

Hence if the somewhat more specialized TRL 85052C kit is not in the firmware of the FieldFox, you could consider selecting the 85033E (which I know is there, since I had that kit) or the 85052B, which I'm fairly confident would be there. That was the point I was trying to make - sorry if I confused you. The 85033E might be a good choice, as you wont get prompted for unnecessary things like sliding loads which you wont have in the 85052C kit. If you select 85052B, you would need to select broadband load if given a choice of loads. 

If the 85052C is not in the firmware of the FieldFox, perhaps you could suggest on the *other forum* that it gets added in a later firmware release. 

Sorry once again if I confused you. 

Dave
举报

黎菁菁

2018-12-12 17:44:54
在手持设备论坛中查看我的回复!


以上来自于谷歌翻译


     以下为原文

  See my reply in the Handheld forum!

Ken
举报

更多回帖

发帖
×
20
完善资料,
赚取积分