引用: 张友芬1 发表于 2018-9-20 16:42
嗨Mark,远程自动量程确实只适用于N6781A和N6782A。
前面板自动量程很慢,基本上都在进行测量,如果超出范围,它会提升范围。
虽然它在前面板上并不明显,因为它具有更新速率的好处。
谢谢,马特,回复。
我明白你在说什么。
然而,我们正在努力使用通用(本土)软件应用程序进行非常低电流(大约10 uA)的自动测量,该应用程序不会提前知道负载。
因此,它无法猜测所需的范围,当然,在更高的范围内,精度对于非常低的电流是不可接受的。
有关如何绕过这个的任何想法?
我的最后一个解决方案是让测试技术手动设置范围,这取决于预期的负载 - 但是,这确实是一个不太令人满意的解决方案。
再次,感谢Matt,-Mark R.嗯...没关系...... :)重新阅读你的答案,它发生在我身上我应该可以做与前面板自动调整相同的事情 - 如果软件检测到
超范围然后加强范围再试一次。编辑:mroyer36于2015年9月24日下午3:56
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Thanks, Matt, for the reply.
I understand what you're saying.
However, we are struggling making automated measurements of very low current (circa 10 uA) with a general purpose (home grown) software app that doesn't know the load ahead of time. So, it can't guess the range required and on the higher ranges the accuracy is unacceptable for very low currents, of course.
Any thoughts on how to get around this?
My last ditch solution will be to have the test tech set the range by hand, depending on the anticipated load - but, that's really a less satisfactory solution.
Again, thanks Matt,
-Mark R.
Ummm... nevermind... :)
Re-reading your answer, it occurs to me I should be able to do the same thing as the front-panel autoranging - if the software detects an overrange then step up the range and try again.
Edited by: mroyer36 on Sep 24, 2015 3:56 PM
引用: 张友芬1 发表于 2018-9-20 16:42
嗨Mark,远程自动量程确实只适用于N6781A和N6782A。
前面板自动量程很慢,基本上都在进行测量,如果超出范围,它会提升范围。
虽然它在前面板上并不明显,因为它具有更新速率的好处。
谢谢,马特,回复。
我明白你在说什么。
然而,我们正在努力使用通用(本土)软件应用程序进行非常低电流(大约10 uA)的自动测量,该应用程序不会提前知道负载。
因此,它无法猜测所需的范围,当然,在更高的范围内,精度对于非常低的电流是不可接受的。
有关如何绕过这个的任何想法?
我的最后一个解决方案是让测试技术手动设置范围,这取决于预期的负载 - 但是,这确实是一个不太令人满意的解决方案。
再次,感谢Matt,-Mark R.嗯...没关系...... :)重新阅读你的答案,它发生在我身上我应该可以做与前面板自动调整相同的事情 - 如果软件检测到
超范围然后加强范围再试一次。编辑:mroyer36于2015年9月24日下午3:56
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Thanks, Matt, for the reply.
I understand what you're saying.
However, we are struggling making automated measurements of very low current (circa 10 uA) with a general purpose (home grown) software app that doesn't know the load ahead of time. So, it can't guess the range required and on the higher ranges the accuracy is unacceptable for very low currents, of course.
Any thoughts on how to get around this?
My last ditch solution will be to have the test tech set the range by hand, depending on the anticipated load - but, that's really a less satisfactory solution.
Again, thanks Matt,
-Mark R.
Ummm... nevermind... :)
Re-reading your answer, it occurs to me I should be able to do the same thing as the front-panel autoranging - if the software detects an overrange then step up the range and try again.
Edited by: mroyer36 on Sep 24, 2015 3:56 PM
举报