怎么使用S70FS01GS或Flash作为Xilinx UllasCal+ FPGA的配置存储器

嗨，劳丽，
我们有一个名单，我们的芯片组合作伙伴和他们支持的部分在我们的网页上。我提供链接。在这里你会发现Xilinx支持的所有部件。
HTTP://www. CyPas.COM/CHIPSET-合作伙伴
请通过它，让我知道如果它解决您的查询。
谢谢，
普拉迪普塔



     以下为原文
  Hi Laurie,
    We have a list of our chipset partners and the parts that they support on our webpage. I am providing the link. Here you will find all the parts that are supported by Xilinx.
    http://www.cypress.com/chipset-partners
    Kindly go through it and let me know if it resolves your query.
    Thanks,
    Pradipta.

嗨，Pradipta，
该列表似乎只列出了已被证明在评估卡等方面工作的设备。
S70FS01GS不包括在此，而是足迹兼容，具有与S25FL512S设备相同的串行命令集。
这是否意味着它将在同一庄园中工作，并以同样的方式被锡林斯冲击？
干杯，
劳丽



     以下为原文
  Hi Pradipta,
    That list only seems to list devices that have been proven to work on evaluation cards etc.
    The S70FS01GS is not included in this, but is footprint compatible and has the same serial command set as the S25FL512S device.
    does this mean it will work in the same manor, and be programmed by Xilinx iMPACT in the same way?
    Cheers,
    Laurie

嗨，Krishna，
你能告诉我为什么这个记忆不支持超薄加FPGA配置吗？
这是一个问题，由于设备家族的不同，即FL和FS，如果是这样，有什么区别？
我的印象是，1GbT设备只是一个512MbT设备的DDP，其中支持FL版本？
超薄FPGA的最小所需配置内存大小是512MbT，那么为什么不支持1GbDDP版本？
干杯，
劳丽



     以下为原文
  Hi Krishna,
    Can you explain to me why this memory is not supported for Ultrascale Plus FPGA configuration?
    Is this a problem due to the difference in device families, i.e. FL and FS, if so what is the difference?
    I was under the impression that the 1Gbit device is just a DDP of the 512Mbit device, of which the FL version is supported?
    The minimum required configuration memory size for the Ultrascale FPGA is 512Mbit, so why would a 1Gbit DDP version not be supported?
    Cheers,
    Laurie

嗨，劳丽，
由于我们的1.8V S25FS S不支持双输出和四输出命令，Xilinx超规模FPGA可以
仅支持单个I/O FS S，这对性能有严重影响。正如你提到的S70FS01GS设备是一个双芯片堆栈的两个FS512S模具不推荐。
然而，Xilinx FPGA确实支持我们的1.3VVI/O的3V FL-S系列，这就是为什么我们推荐FL-S设备而不是FS S。
请参阅以下链接的申请须知：
HTTP://www. CyPress .COM/FIL/193026/下载
Xilinx ISE工具测试和支持的设备列表可以在：
http://www. xelimx.com /支持/文档/ SWI手册/ XILIX14147／ISEFAIL
希望能澄清你的疑问。
谢谢，
Krishna。



     以下为原文
  Hi Laurie,
    Due to the fact our 1.8V S25FS-S does not support Dual Output and Quad Output commands, Xilinx  Ultra-scale FPGA can
    only support Single I/O FS-S which has a severe impact on performance.  As you mentioned S70FS01GS device is a dual die stack of two FS512S die it is not recommended.
    However, Xilinx FPGA do support our 3V FL-S family with 1.8V Vi/o which is why we recommend FL-S devices instead of FS-S.
    Please refer the application note from the link given below :
    http://www.cypress.com/file/193026/download
    The list of devices that are tested and supported by the Xilinx ISE tools can be found at:
    https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/sw_manuals/xilinx14_7/isehelp_start.htm#pim_c_introduction_indirect_programming.htm
    Hope the it clarifies your query.
    Thanks,
    Krishna.

嗨，劳丽，
q）数据表中的第一页说明FS—S设备支持双I/O和四次I/O读，这不正确吗？？
Q）不，这是正确的。FS SDEVICESS支持双I/O和四次I/O读取。支持的读四命令是：EBh，ECH，EDH和EEH。St25FS SDS不支持6BH（1-1-4）命令用于四读。
谢谢，
奎师那。



     以下为原文
  Hi Laurie,
    Q) Page one of the datasheet states that the FS-S devices supports Dual I/O and Quad I/O reads, is this incorrect then??
    Q) No it is correct. FS-S devices supports Dual I/O and Quad I/O reads. The supported read quad commands are: EBh, ECh, EDh and EEh.The S25FS-S devices do not support 6Bh (1-1-4) command for quad reading. 
    Thanks,
    krishna.

嗨，Krishna，
我现在看到了，这是一组不同的双读和四读命令，Xilinx不支持这个命令。
这是将来会得到支持的东西吗？由于具有大型配置设备的能力是有利的。
干杯，
劳丽



     以下为原文
  Hi Krishna,
    I see now, so its a different set of dual and quad read commands, which are not supported by xilinx?
    Is this something that will be supported in the future? as the ability to have a large configuration device is advantagus.
    Cheers,
    Laurie

嗨，劳丽，
Q）我现在看到了，这是一组不同的双读和四读命令，Xilinx不支持它。
是的，你的理解是正确的。
Q）这是将来会支持的东西吗？由于具有大型配置设备的能力是有利的。
A）我不完全确定，因为我们有由LILIXXFPGA支持的相同密度的FL-S装置。
谢谢，
Krishna。



     以下为原文
  Hi Laurie,
    Q) I see now, so its a different set of dual and quad read commands, which are not supported by xilinx?
    A) Yes your understanding is correct.
    Q) Is this something that will be supported in the future? as the ability to have a large configuration device is advantagus.
    A) I am not entirely sure because we  have FL-S device of the same density which is supported by Xilinx FPGAs.
    Thanks,
    Krishna.

嗨，Krishna，
是的，但是1GBIT FL-S设备有两个芯片选择，这使得FPGA配置内存难以实现，而ANMCS FielErgGER比512MBIT更难实现。
干杯，
劳丽



     以下为原文
  Hi Krishna,
    Yes but the 1Gbit FL-S device has two chip selects, making it hard to implement for an FPGA config memory, with an MCS file larger than 512Mbit.
    Cheers,
    Laurie