完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
问候,我有一个关于在PNA-X(N5245A,H85)上使用源衰减自动范围的问题。
我的应用程序需要测试端口的已知/可追踪功率电平。 如果我在一个功率级别执行源/接收器校准,当PNA在不同功率级别测量时自动改变源衰减器电平时,校准是否仍然有效? 我将源衰减器偏移开,并将R1视为功率参考。 谢谢! 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Greetings, I have a question on using the source attenuation auto range on the PNA-X (N5245A, H85). My application would require known/traceable power levels at the test port. If I performed source/receiver cal at one power level, will the calibration still be valid when the PNA changes the source attenuator levels automatically when measuring at different power levels? I left the source attenuator offset on and treat R1 as a power reference. thank you! |
|
相关推荐
2个回答
|
|
当衰减器改变时,衰减器偏移被补偿,但仅有一个固定的偏移数(例如,对于10dB的变化恰好为10dB),但衰减器具有一些非理想的行为,并且可能具有9.75或10.25dB的损耗。
这是源功率中的错误。 两种解决方法:1)使用开环模式,它可以提供70 dB的范围(将低端向下降30 dB,因此你可以从低于-60 dB到达+ 10 dB左右) )。 2)使用call-all校准多个通道,每个通道具有不同的衰减器值。 然后使用通道测量您想要的功率。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 The attenuator offset is compensated when the attenuator is changed but only with a single, fixed offset number (e.g. exactly 10 dB for a 10 dB change) but the attenuators have some non-ideal behavior and might have 9.75 or 10.25 dB of loss. This is an error in the source power. Two work-arounds: 1) use open loop mode, which gives you 70 dB of range (drops the low end down by an additional 30 dB, so you can go from -60 dB below the attenutor value to +10 dB or so above). 2) use call-all to calibrate several channels, each with a different attenuator value. Then use the channel for the measurement of power that you want to make. |
|
|
|
最简洁的答案是不。
它与源衰减器的位置有关(见下图)。 衰减器位于参考接收器之后,因此参考接收器无法看到新衰减器设置下的路径损耗的任何变化,因此即使您打开接收器调平,源功率电平也不会得到非常精确的补偿。 当接通时,衰减器偏移偏好对衰减器设置的标称损耗进行粗略补偿,但不补偿新衰减器路径的频率响应。 作为一般规则,当您关注精确的功率设置和/或读数时,不应将源衰减器保持在自动模式。 PNA-X具有较大的ALC范围(在大多数频率下约为40 dB),您应该选择一个衰减器设置,以最大化测量的可用ALC范围。 一旦确定了这一点,就可以手动放置衰减器,执行导向功率校准,然后使用ALC系列来改变功率。 打开接收器调平后,将测量并补偿源线性度的任何不准确性。 您还可以使用开环模式(对于端口1和3)获得比典型40 dB更大的功率范围。 当然,对于Open Loop,我们强烈建议您使用接收器调平。 如果激励设备所需的功率范围仅大于使用ALC或开环的单通道所能达到的功率范围,则可以使用不同的源衰减器设置设置多个通道,然后使用Cal All校准它们。 Cal All例程将执行单个合并功率传感器校准,但会针对不同的衰减器设置更正每个通道。 !HTTPS://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/87949221/Forum/ThredID_115912/SrcAttenuatorLocation.png! 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 the short answer is no. it has to do with the location of the source attenuator (see picture below). the attenuator is after the reference receiver and therefore any changes to the path loss at a new attenuator setting is not seen by the reference receiver and therefore even if you have receiver leveling turned on, the source power level will not be very accurately compensated for. the attenuator offset preference, when turned on, does a rough compensation for the nominal loss of the attenuator setting, but the frequency response of the new attenuator path is not compensated for. As a general rule when you are concerned with accurate power setting and/or reading, you should not leave the source attenuator in Auto mode. The PNA-X has a large ALC range (about 40 dB at most frequencies) and you should pick an attenuator setting that maximizes the usable ALC range for your measurement. once you have established that, then you put the attenuators in manual, perform your guided power calibration and then you can use the ALC range to change the power. with receiver leveling turned on, any inaccuracies in the source linearity will be measured and compensated for. You can also use the Open Loop mode (for port 1 and 3) to get even a larger power range than the typical 40 dB. of course with Open Loop, we highly recommend that you use receiver leveling. If the power range that you require to stimulate your device with is simply larger than what you can achieve in a single channel with ALC or open loop, then you can setup multiple channels with different source attenuator settings and then use Cal All to calibrate them. the Cal All routine will do a single consolidated power sensor calibration, but will correct each channel for the different attenuator settings. !https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/87949221/Forum/ThredID_115912/SrcAttenuatorLocation.png! |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
1221 浏览 0 评论
2346 浏览 1 评论
2155 浏览 1 评论
2019 浏览 5 评论
2900 浏览 3 评论
961浏览 1评论
关于Keysight x1149 Boundary Scan Analyzer
697浏览 0评论
N5230C用“CALC:MARK:BWID?”获取Bwid,Cent,Q,Loss失败,请问大佬们怎么解决呀
797浏览 0评论
1221浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-11-22 02:31 , Processed in 1.335653 second(s), Total 80, Slave 64 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号