stm8l052 COSMIC编译器EEPROM _FLASH_NCR2未定义

你好，
 
 这在用户手册的第51/52页（即编译器的/ doc子目录中）进行了解释。
 
 问候，
 
 卢卡



以下为原文







Hello,

this is explained on pages 51/52 of the user manual (that is in the /doc subdirectory of the compiler).

Regards,

Luca

你好卢卡，
 
 
谢谢你的快速回复。正如手册中提到的，我手动将库添加到链接器文件中。我附上了链接器文件。
 
我在“链接器/输入”下更改了STVD中的设置以使用自定义.lkf文件，因此每次都不会覆盖它。也许还有另一种方法可以直接将libl0.sm8库包含在STVD中，但我在短时间内找不到它。
通过此步骤，链接器不再要求FLASH_NCR2定义。
 
但无论如何，写过程仍然存在问题。当我尝试对eeprom执行写入过程时，控制器仍然停止。还有更多事要做吗？
 
这是正常的，我仍然需要自己定义FLASH_CR2和FLASH_IAPSR。
 
问候，
和我



以下为原文





Hello luca,


thanks for the fast reply. As it is mentioned in the manual, I manually added the library to the linker file. I attached the linker file.

And i changed the settings in STVD under ''Linker/Input'' to use a custom .lkf file, so that it is not overwritten every time. Maybe there is also another option to include the libl0.sm8 library directly with STVD, but i could not find it in the short time.
With this step, the linker was not asking for the FLASH_NCR2 definition any more.

But anyway there is still a problem with the write procedure. The controller still stops when i try to perform a write procedure to the eeprom. Is there more to do?

And is it normal, that i still have to define FLASH_CR2 and FLASH_IAPSR by my own.  

Regards,
Andi

今天我也在flash库中找到了这个说明：
 
================================================== =============================
 要从RAM执行的功能
 ================================================== =============================
 
 除了以下定义的所有功能必须从RAM专门执行
 用于可以从Flash执行的FLASH_WaitForLastOperation函数。
 
 
 从RAM执行的步骤从一个工具链到另一个工具链不同：
  - 对于Cosmic Compiler：
 1-通过''#pragma section（FLASH_CODE）''的平均值定义段FLASH_CODE。
 该段在stm8l15x_flash.c文件中定义。
 2-取消注释stm8l15x.h文件中的'#define RAM_EXECUTION（1）''行，
 或者在Cosmic编译器预处理器中定义它以启用FLASH_CODE段
 定义。
 3-在STVD中选择Project  Settings  Linker  Category''input''和RAM部分
 使用''-ic''选项添加FLASH_CODE段。
 4-在main.c文件中调用带有第一个分段字符的_fctcpy（）函数
 参数''_fctcpy（'F'）;''加载声明的可移动代码段
 执行前RAM中的（FLASH_CODE）。
 5-默认情况下，_fctcpy函数打包在Cosmic机器库中，
 所以必须在main.c中添加函数原型''int _fctcopy（char name）;''
 文件。
 
 
是否有必要从RAM执行它？
如何在列表中添加此段并使用哪些命令？
它看起来像这样吗？ （部分出自lkf文件）我自己添加了这一行。
#Segment Ram：
+ seg .data -b 0x100 -m 0x4ff -n .data
+ seg .bss -a .data -n .bss
+ seg .FLASH_CODE -a .data -n .FLASH_CODE -ic
＃＆lt; END SEGMENT_CONF＆gt;



以下为原文





Today I also found this instructions inside the flash-library:

===============================================================================
                         Functions to be executed from RAM
===============================================================================   
  
All the functions defined below must be executed from RAM exclusively, except
for the FLASH_WaitForLastOperation function which can be executed from Flash.


Steps of the execution from RAM differs from one toolchain to another:
- For Cosmic Compiler:
    1- Define a segment FLASH_CODE by the mean of '' #pragma section (FLASH_CODE)''.
    This segment is defined in the stm8l15x_flash.c file.
  2- Uncomment the ''#define RAM_EXECUTION  (1)'' line in the stm8l15x.h file,
    or define it in Cosmic compiler preprocessor to enable the FLASH_CODE segment
   definition.
  3- In STVD Select ProjectSettingsLinkerCategory ''input'' and in the RAM section
    add the FLASH_CODE segment with ''-ic'' options.
  4- In main.c file call the _fctcpy() function with first segment character as  
    parameter ''_fctcpy('F');'' to load the declared moveable code segment
    (FLASH_CODE) in RAM before execution.
  5- By default the _fctcpy function is packaged in the Cosmic machine library,
    so the function prototype ''int _fctcopy(char name);'' must be added in main.c
    file.


Is it necessary to execute it from RAM?  
How can i add this segement in the list and with which commands?
Could it look like this? (part out of lkf-file) I added this line by my own.
# Segment Ram:
+seg .data -b 0x100 -m 0x4ff -n .data
+seg .bss -a .data -n .bss
+seg .FLASH_CODE -a .data -n .FLASH_CODE -ic
#

我解决了我的问题。我忘了解锁我的EEPROM。对不起，谢谢你的第一个提示。这个是必要的。
 
 
问候



以下为原文





I solved my problem. I forgot to unlock my EEPROM. Sorry and thanks for the first hint. This one was necessary.


Regards