完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
当执行“SN,和L.字母数字& gt”,例如“SN,QWERTY”或“SN,12345”时,我得到了“ERR”响应,然后是“CMD & Gt”。具有讽刺意味的是,这个名字实际上是被设定的!当启用回音时,没有“错误”。请参阅附件TXT文件SNROR.TXT。还有人看到这个吗?
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 I am getting and "Err" response followed by "CMD> " when executing "SN, Attachment(s) SNError.txt (0.66 KB) - downloaded 36 times |
|
相关推荐
1个回答
|
|
附加信息,考虑下面的交换,使用“SN”命令作为一个例子:%ReGoo%%输入:$$$CMD>Enter:SN,AbcDeErCMD&G.AKKCMD & GT;这意味着“SN”命令执行导致“Err”,然后出现“CMD & Gt”,这意味着RNC48已经准备好下一个命令。然后我们得到“AOK”,这肯定是RN48 70作为“SN”命令的一部分输出的最后一件事,但是我们已经移动了,因为RN870已经响应“CMD & Gt”,说RN48 70准备好下一个命令,我解释说这意味着我们完成了“SN”命令。它将伪造的“AOK”和额外的“CMD & GT”转换为下一个命令的交换。此外,进一步的实验表明,“SN”命令在回响或关闭状态下的行为相同。是否有描述如何处理RN870的各种其他响应,主要是“错误”响应?以“SN”命令行为为例,显然是“AOK”一个bug出现的无序状态,还是我们必须处理一个特殊的情况?“AOK”即使在“Err”之前也应该存在吗?
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 Additional info, consider the following exchange using the "SN," command as an example: %REBOOT% ENTER: $$$ CMD> ENTER: SN,ABCDE Err CMD> AOK CMD> This means that the "SN," command executes resulting in "Err", then comes "CMD> " meaning the RN4870 is ready for the next command. Then we get "AOK" which must be the last thing the RN4870 outputs as a part of the "SN," command, but we have already moved on because the RN4870 has already responded "CMD> " saying that the RN4870 is ready for the next command which I interpret to mean we are DONE with the "SN," command. This rolls the bogus "AOK" and the EXTRA "CMD> " into the exchange for the next command. Also, further experimentation indicates the "SN," command behaves the same under ECHO ON or OFF. Is there a description somewhere about how to handle the various other responses, chiefly the "Err" response, for the RN4870? Using the "SN," command behavior as an example, is the apparent out-of-order appearance of the "AOK" a bug or do we have to deal with a special case? Should the "AOK" even be there if it is preceded by "Err"? |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
5082 浏览 9 评论
1954 浏览 8 评论
1889 浏览 10 评论
请问是否能把一个ADC值转换成两个字节用来设置PWM占空比?
3118 浏览 3 评论
请问电源和晶体值之间有什么关系吗?PIC在正常条件下运行4MHz需要多少电压?
2189 浏览 5 评论
635浏览 1评论
511浏览 1评论
有偿咨询,关于MPLAB X IPE烧录PIC32MX所遇到的问题
372浏览 1评论
PIC Kit3出现目标设备ID(00000000)与预期的设备ID(02c20000)不匹配。是什么原因
539浏览 0评论
441浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-10-1 20:34 , Processed in 1.181401 second(s), Total 76, Slave 60 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号