在RN4870上使用SN命令时获得Err

附加信息，考虑下面的交换，使用“SN”命令作为一个例子：%ReGoo%%输入：$$$CMD＆GT；Enter：SN，AbcDeErCMD＆G.AKKCMD & GT；这意味着“SN”命令执行导致“Err”，然后出现“CMD & Gt”，这意味着RNC48已经准备好下一个命令。然后我们得到“AOK”，这肯定是RN48 70作为“SN”命令的一部分输出的最后一件事，但是我们已经移动了，因为RN870已经响应“CMD & Gt”，说RN48 70准备好下一个命令，我解释说这意味着我们完成了“SN”命令。它将伪造的“AOK”和额外的“CMD & GT”转换为下一个命令的交换。此外，进一步的实验表明，“SN”命令在回响或关闭状态下的行为相同。是否有描述如何处理RN870的各种其他响应，主要是“错误”响应？以“SN”命令行为为例，显然是“AOK”一个bug出现的无序状态，还是我们必须处理一个特殊的情况？“AOK”即使在“Err”之前也应该存在吗？



      以下为原文

    Additional info, consider the following exchange using the "SN," command as an example:
 
%REBOOT%
 
ENTER: $$$
 
CMD>
 
ENTER: SN,ABCDE
Err
CMD> AOK
CMD>
 
This means that the "SN," command executes resulting in "Err", then comes "CMD> " meaning the RN4870 is ready for the next command. Then we get "AOK" which must be the last thing the RN4870 outputs as a part of the "SN," command, but we have already moved on because the RN4870 has already responded "CMD> " saying that the RN4870 is ready for the next command which I interpret to mean we are DONE with the "SN," command. This rolls the bogus "AOK" and the EXTRA "CMD> " into the exchange for the next command.
 
Also, further experimentation indicates the "SN," command behaves the same under ECHO ON or OFF. Is there a description somewhere about how to handle the various other responses, chiefly the "Err" response, for the RN4870? Using the "SN," command behavior as an example, is the apparent out-of-order appearance of the "AOK" a bug or do we have to deal with a special case? Should the "AOK" even be there if it is preceded by "Err"?