完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
我正在使用vivado 2014.2。
我的设计包含MIG示例设计,TRIMAC示例设计和我的逻辑。 个别资源的实施后资源利用率低于40%。 Route design指令在实现属性中设置为default。 问题是我的设计在路由步骤中花了很长时间。 我已经把它留了5个小时但是被击中的点是(在日志窗口中) 阶段4.2全局迭代1具有重叠的节点数= 20013具有重叠的节点数= 7137 它是某个地方是无限循环(vivado bug)还是我应该等待更多? 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 I am using vivado 2014.2. My design contains MIG example design, TRIMAC example design plus my logic. Post implementation resource utilization is under 40 % for individual resources. Route design directive is set to default in implementation properties. Problem is my design is taking tooooo long in routing step. I have left it for our 5 hours but the struck point is (in log window) Phase 4.2 Global Iteration 1 Number of Nodes with overlaps = 20013 Number of Nodes with overlaps = 7137 Is it struck somewhere is an infinite loop (vivado bug) or should i wait more? |
|
相关推荐
5个回答
|
|
嗨,您使用的是哪种操作系统?请更改实施策略并运行。
谢谢,维杰----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------请将帖子标记为 一个答案“接受为解决方案”,以防它有助于解决您的查询。如果一个帖子引导到解决方案,请给予赞誉。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hi, Which OS are you using? Please change the implementation strategies and run.Thanks,Vijay -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please mark the post as an answer "Accept as solution" in case it helped resolve your query. Give kudos in case a post in case it guided to the solution. |
|
|
|
我正在使用Windows 7.您推荐的实施策略中是否有特定的内容?
以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 I am using windows 7. is there something specific in implementation stratgies you recomend? |
|
|
|
嗨,尝试Flow_RuntimeOptimized有关更多信息,请参阅http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/sw_manuals/xilinx2014_2/ug904-vivado-implementation.pdf的第137页。
谢谢,维杰----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------请将帖子标记为 一个答案“接受为解决方案”,以防它有助于解决您的查询。如果一个帖子引导到解决方案,请给予赞誉。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hi, Try Flow_RuntimeOptimized Refer to page 137 of http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/sw_manuals/xilinx2014_2/ug904-vivado-implementation.pdf for more informationThanks,Vijay -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please mark the post as an answer "Accept as solution" in case it helped resolve your query. Give kudos in case a post in case it guided to the solution. |
|
|
|
从日志来看,由于节点重叠很多,它看起来似乎是一个拥挤的设计。
你可以运行一些策略: #1 Place_design -directive探索 Route_design -directive探索 #2 place_design -directive ExtraNetDelay_high phys_opt_design -directive AggressiveFanoutOpt route_design -directive MoreGlobalIterations #3 place_design -directive ExtraNetDelay_high route_design -directive MoreGlobalIterations #4 place_design -directive ExtraNetDelay_high route_design -directive HigherDelayCost 试试这些。 希望这可以帮助。 问候 Sikta 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 From the log, It definitely seems a congested design as there are lot of node overlaps. Can you run some strategies: #1 Place_design –directive Explore Route_design –directive Explore #2 place_design -directive ExtraNetDelay_high phys_opt_design -directive AggressiveFanoutOpt route_design -directive MoreGlobalIterations #3 place_design -directive ExtraNetDelay_high route_design -directive MoreGlobalIterations #4 place_design -directive ExtraNetDelay_high route_design -directive HigherDelayCost Try with these. Hope this helps. Regards Sikta |
|
|
|
嗨,
我假设您正在使用sysem版许可证,否则这可能是问题所在。 您还可以列出MIG和TRIMAC以及您的自定义逻辑模块的模块级利用率 你自己的逻辑包含什么? 如果你评论自己的逻辑需要多长时间? 如果相关问题适用于您,请检查相关讨论。请按照建议进行操作 http://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Implementation/Vivado-implementation-taking-too-long-using-RPMs/td-p/485428 http://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Implementation/Place-amp-Route-takes-too-long/td-p/481410 http://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Embedded-Processor-System-Design/How-long-to-implement-a-vivado-project/td-p/449466 问候, Vanitha -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------请在发布前进行谷歌搜索, 您可能会找到相关信息。请留下帖子 - “接受为解决方案”,如果提供的信息有用且回复,请给予赞誉 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hi, I assume you are using sysem edition license, else this can be the issue. Also can you list out module level utilization for MIG and TRIMAC and your custom logic module What does your own logic contains? How much time did it take if you comment out your own logic? Please check relavant discussions if in case they apply to you..follow the suggestions http://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Implementation/Vivado-implementation-taking-too-long-using-RPMs/td-p/485428 http://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Implementation/Place-amp-Route-takes-too-long/td-p/481410 http://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Embedded-Processor-System-Design/How-long-to-implement-a-vivado-project/td-p/449466 Regards, Vanitha --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do google search before posting, you may find relavant information. Mark the post - "Accept as solution" and give kudos if information provided is helpful and reply oriented |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
2424 浏览 7 评论
2826 浏览 4 评论
Spartan 3-AN时钟和VHDL让ISE合成时出现错误该怎么办?
2294 浏览 9 评论
3375 浏览 0 评论
如何在RTL或xilinx spartan fpga的约束文件中插入1.56ns延迟缓冲区?
2465 浏览 15 评论
有输入,但是LVDS_25的FPGA内部接收不到数据,为什么?
1237浏览 1评论
请问vc707的电源线是如何连接的,我这边可能出现了缺失元件的情况导致无法供电
590浏览 1评论
求一块XILINX开发板KC705,VC707,KC105和KCU1500
453浏览 1评论
2006浏览 0评论
732浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-12-25 15:51 , Processed in 1.554848 second(s), Total 87, Slave 70 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号