我有一台N5242A,正在运行PLTS2013,用于微探测器设置。
在过去,我使用校准基板进行微探测,并使用未知直通校准来获得单个微探针的S参数。
然后,我在我的电缆末端进行测量并测量我的DUT。
之后,我将在PLTS中将微探针部分嵌入到PLTS中。
我知道我应该为每个微探针获得参数,但我现在只是放弃了这个精度。
为了完全准确,我意识到我应该使用我的校准基板并执行完整的4端口校准。
这里的问题是,在我完成DUT测量设置并准备就绪之前,我并不总是确切地知道我将使用哪种探头间距和信号接地配置。
我通常测量裸产品板,我的接触点的位置和音调可能会有所不同。
设置探头位置可能需要几个小时的工作时间。
我讨厌做出校准后,我不想把它拆掉,但这几乎是我必须要做的,以确保我有正确的探针与正确的端口相匹配。
我在PLTS中没有使用过很多校准功能。
我知道当我开始新测量时,我会选择校准,使用存储的校准或不使用校准。
我假设在使用时没有选择校准,事后可以通过某种方式将校准应用于待测文件。
在这种情况下,我想最初在我的电缆末端使用校准,但稍后返回并在探头尖端处应用校准来代替电缆末端校准。
PLTS有可能吗?
谢谢,迈克尔
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
I have an N5242A and am runing PLTS2013 used on a microprobing setup. In the past I have used the calibra
tion substrate for my microprobes and calibration with an unknown thru to get the S-parameters for a single microprobe. Then, I calbrate at my cable ends and measure my DUT. Later, I will de-embed the microprobe part of the response in PLTS. I know I should really get parameters for each microprobe, but I am just giving up that accuracy for now.
To be completely accurate I realize I should use my calibration substrate and perform a full 4-port calibration. The catch here is that I don't always know exactly which probe pitches and signal-ground configuration I will use until I have the full DUT measurement set up and ready to go. I typically measure bare product boards, and my contact points can vary in placement and pitch quite a bit. Setting up the probe positions can be a couple hour job. I hate to tear it down as soon as I have it figured out to do the calibration, but that's pretty much what I would have to do to make sure I have the right probe matched with the right port.
There are a lot of calibration functions that I haven't used in PLTS. I know when I start a new measurement, I get the options to calibrate, use a stored calibration, or use no calibration. I assume that when using no calibration is selected that there is some way to apply a calibration to the dut file after the fact. In this case I'd like to initially use the calibration at my cable ends, but later go back and apply a calibration at the probe tips in place of the cable end calibration. Is that possible in PLTS?
Thanks,
Michael