引用: uwyywefwd 发表于 2019-4-16 12:19
组数(GPIB命令是“NUMG”,因为我看到你昨天发布在你的另一个帖子中)是针对正在使用扫描平均功能的情况。
例如,假设您想要读取其数据在8次扫描中平均的测量迹线。
您可以将分析仪置于扫描保持模式,将平均因子设置为8并打开平均值。
> {quote:title = bhokkan写道:} {quote}> Number Of Groups(GPIB命令是'NUMG',因为我看到你昨天发布在你的另一个帖子中)是针对正在使用扫描平均功能的情况。
例如,假设您想要读取其数据在8次扫描中平均的测量迹线。
您可以将分析仪置于扫描保持模式,将平均因子设置为8并打开平均值。
然后你可以做Number of Groups = 8,并在8次扫描结束时读取(平均)跟踪。
或者你可以做Number Of Groups =,读取部分平均的轨迹,并重复直到发生了8次扫描。
我从来没有尝试过像这样阅读平均数据,我发现在8720D的一般使用中很烦人的是平均值是如何工作的。
在我看来,如果你将平均值设置为16,那么在16次扫描之后,跟踪不稳定。
将平均值设置为N不会导致最后N组数据的简单均值。
我想我在某处看到了平均值在8720D中呈指数加权,所以我假设其频率较高的表兄8722D。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
> {quote:title=bhokkan wrote:}{quote}
> Number Of Groups (GPIB command is 'NUMG' as I see you posted in your other thread yesterday) is geared toward situations where the sweep averaging feature is being used. For example, say you want to read a measurement trace whose data is averaged over 8 sweeps. You would put the analyzer into sweep Hold mode, set the averaging factor to 8 and turn averaging on. Then you could do Number of Groups = 8, and read the (averaged) trace when the 8 sweeps finish. Or you could do Number Of Groups = , read the partially averaged trace, and repeat until the 8 total sweeps have occurred.
I've never tried reading averaged data like this, something I have found annoying in general use of the 8720D is how the averaging works. It appears to me that if you set the average at say 16, then after 16 sweeps, the trace is not stable. Setting the average to N, does not result in a simple mean being taken of the last N sets of data. I think I read somewhere the averaging is exponentially weighted in the 8720D, and so I assume in its higher frequency cousin, the 8722D.
引用: uwyywefwd 发表于 2019-4-16 12:19
组数(GPIB命令是“NUMG”,因为我看到你昨天发布在你的另一个帖子中)是针对正在使用扫描平均功能的情况。
例如,假设您想要读取其数据在8次扫描中平均的测量迹线。
您可以将分析仪置于扫描保持模式,将平均因子设置为8并打开平均值。
> {quote:title = bhokkan写道:} {quote}> Number Of Groups(GPIB命令是'NUMG',因为我看到你昨天发布在你的另一个帖子中)是针对正在使用扫描平均功能的情况。
例如,假设您想要读取其数据在8次扫描中平均的测量迹线。
您可以将分析仪置于扫描保持模式,将平均因子设置为8并打开平均值。
然后你可以做Number of Groups = 8,并在8次扫描结束时读取(平均)跟踪。
或者你可以做Number Of Groups =,读取部分平均的轨迹,并重复直到发生了8次扫描。
我从来没有尝试过像这样阅读平均数据,我发现在8720D的一般使用中很烦人的是平均值是如何工作的。
在我看来,如果你将平均值设置为16,那么在16次扫描之后,跟踪不稳定。
将平均值设置为N不会导致最后N组数据的简单均值。
我想我在某处看到了平均值在8720D中呈指数加权,所以我假设其频率较高的表兄8722D。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
> {quote:title=bhokkan wrote:}{quote}
> Number Of Groups (GPIB command is 'NUMG' as I see you posted in your other thread yesterday) is geared toward situations where the sweep averaging feature is being used. For example, say you want to read a measurement trace whose data is averaged over 8 sweeps. You would put the analyzer into sweep Hold mode, set the averaging factor to 8 and turn averaging on. Then you could do Number of Groups = 8, and read the (averaged) trace when the 8 sweeps finish. Or you could do Number Of Groups = , read the partially averaged trace, and repeat until the 8 total sweeps have occurred.
I've never tried reading averaged data like this, something I have found annoying in general use of the 8720D is how the averaging works. It appears to me that if you set the average at say 16, then after 16 sweeps, the trace is not stable. Setting the average to N, does not result in a simple mean being taken of the last N sets of data. I think I read somewhere the averaging is exponentially weighted in the 8720D, and so I assume in its higher frequency cousin, the 8722D.
举报