基于人们在Web上发布的内容（例如SEGGER比较），Read ICE的速度与ICD3相同。如果ICD4比ICD3快，那么它比实际的还要快。ICD4内部有较新的SPARAN-6 FPGA和PIC32。一定很快。另一方面，ICD3也有FPGA和DSPIC33，但在DSPIC33 EP芯片上的编程速度比基于PIC16F1454的单芯片设计慢3倍。如果ICD4比ICD3快2倍，那么仍有一些方法可以满足NSDSP的速度。
以上来自于百度翻译
以下为原文
Based on what people post on the Web (e.g. Segger comparisons), ReadICE is the same speed as ICD3. If ICD4 is faster than ICD3 then it is also faster than RealICE.
ICD4 has newer Sparan-6 FPGA and PIC32 inside. Must be very fast. On the other hand, ICD3 also had FPGA and dsPIC33, yet it was 3 times slower in programming dsPIC33EP chips than my single-chip design based on PIC16F1454. If ICD4 is only 2 times faster than ICD3, there's still some way to go to match NSDSP speed.
基于人们在Web上发布的内容（例如SEGGER比较），Read ICE的速度与ICD3相同。如果ICD4比ICD3快，那么它比实际的还要快。ICD4内部有较新的SPARAN-6 FPGA和PIC32。一定很快。另一方面，ICD3也有FPGA和DSPIC33，但在DSPIC33 EP芯片上的编程速度比基于PIC16F1454的单芯片设计慢3倍。如果ICD4比ICD3快2倍，那么仍有一些方法可以满足NSDSP的速度。
以上来自于百度翻译
以下为原文
Based on what people post on the Web (e.g. Segger comparisons), ReadICE is the same speed as ICD3. If ICD4 is faster than ICD3 then it is also faster than RealICE.
ICD4 has newer Sparan-6 FPGA and PIC32 inside. Must be very fast. On the other hand, ICD3 also had FPGA and dsPIC33, yet it was 3 times slower in programming dsPIC33EP chips than my single-chip design based on PIC16F1454. If ICD4 is only 2 times faster than ICD3, there's still some way to go to match NSDSP speed.
举报
