完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
我在计量实验室工作,并在各种功率计上进行校准。
当我使用大多数服务手册中提到的程序测量功率计的“功率参考”输出电平时,我有点担心我看到的一些含糊之处。 按照程序,我使用的是432B型功率计和478A型热敏电阻安装座,均经过工厂校准和认证,以及经过校准的34401A数字万用表。 我将这个测量结果与我使用新出厂校准和认证的E4419B以及几个经过工厂校准和认证的8480系列功率传感器进行比较。 我刚刚在E4418B功率计上执行了这些测量,并使用手册中调出的方法计算出它为0.981 mW,这意味着我需要调整功率参考以满足规范。 但是,当我测量功率参考时。 使用E4419B和功率传感器,我的读数为1.001 mW,几乎是完美的。 这是我校准的所有功率计的结果。 为什么方法之间的差距是我使用的替代方法? 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 I work in a Metrology Lab and perform calibrations on a wide range of power meters. I am a little concerned with some ambiguities I am seeing when I am measuring the "Power Reference" output levels of power meters utilizing the procedure called out in most of the service manuals. Per the procedure I am using a model 432B Power Meter and a model 478A Thermistor Mount, both freshly factory calibrated and certified and a calibrated 34401A DMM. I am comparing this measurement against one I make using a freshly factory calibrated and certified E4419B and several factory calibrated and certified 8480 series power sensors. I just performed these measurements on an E4418B power meter and using the method called out in the manual calculated it to be 0.981 mW which means I would need to adjust the power reference to meet spec. However, when I measure the power ref. with the E4419B and power sensor I get a reading of 1.001 mW whic is almost perfect. This is quite typical of my results on all the power meters I calibrate. Why the desparity between methods and is the alternate method I use acceptable? |
|
相关推荐
4个回答
|
|
这种差异可能有几个原因。
但我需要先问一个问题。 当您使用E4419B及其传感器测量E4418B的1 mW参考功率电平并获得1.001 mw时,您使用1 mW参考源来校准E4419B /传感器组合? 是E4419B的参考还是其他参考? 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 There could be a couple of reasons for this difference. But I need to ask one question first. When you measured the E4418B's 1 mW reference power level using the E4419B and its sensor and got 1.001 mw what 1 mW reference source did you use to calibrate the E4419B/sensor combination? Was it the E4419B's reference, or another reference? |
|
|
|
我使用的是E4419Bs电源参考。
我刚从供应商校准中收到它,我要求他们优化参考,因为它是我的实验室标准,我希望它尽可能准确。 功率传感器也是如此。 我将实验室中的各种型号中的至少2种作为标准每年送回供应商,以便对其进行表征。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 I used the E4419Bs Power Reference. I had just received it back from a vendor calibration in which I requested that they optimize the reference as it was my lab standard and I wanted it to be as accurate as possible. This was also the case with the power sensors. I route at least 2 each of the various models I have in the lab as standards back to the vendor each year to have them characterized. |
|
|
|
maruidiyi 发表于 2019-7-26 14:47 检查以确保您使用的478A是实际的-H73,-H75或-H76选项。 只有具有这些选项的那些具有所需的SWR才能执行功率计参考的测量。 另外,测量432A和电缆的实际电阻,以便在功率计算中使用该电阻值而不是标称200欧姆。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Check to ensure the 478A you are using is an actual -H73, -H75, or -H76 option. Only the ones with these options have the required SWR to perform the measurement of a power meter reference. Also, measure the actual resistance of your 432A and cable so you can use that resistance value in the power calculation instead of the nominal 200 ohms. |
|
|
|
我不确定是什么导致了测量之间的差异。
在您使用432B的方式中,它应该比您也使用的E4419B更准确。 我不确定您使用E4419B的传感器是什么,但带有E9300A传感器的E4419B的测量不确定度仅为2.072%。 432A的不确定性甚至低于此。 所以这两种方法都应该给你一个非常接近的答案。你有另一种方法来验证这两种功率计的准确性吗? 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 I am not sure what is causing the difference between the measurements. In the way you are using the 432B it should be more accurate than the E4419B that you also used. I am not sure what sensor you are using with the E4419B, however the measurement uncertainty for the E4419B with a E9300A sensor is only 2.072%. The 432A uncertainty is even less than this. So both methods should get you an answer that is very close to each other. Have you got another method to verify the accuracy of both of these power meters? |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
1283 浏览 0 评论
2371 浏览 1 评论
2189 浏览 1 评论
2062 浏览 5 评论
2946 浏览 3 评论
1103浏览 1评论
关于Keysight x1149 Boundary Scan Analyzer
750浏览 0评论
N5230C用“CALC:MARK:BWID?”获取Bwid,Cent,Q,Loss失败,请问大佬们怎么解决呀
921浏览 0评论
1283浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-12-22 13:33 , Processed in 1.526567 second(s), Total 82, Slave 66 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号