确定适配器是否相位匹配的最佳方法是什么？

我有一些3.5毫米到N的适配器* 2 x公N到母3,5 mm * 1 x公N到公3.5 mm * 1 x母N到公3.5 mm * 1 x母N到母3.5 mm这些适配器随附
我从eBay购买的85033E 3.5 mm 9 GHz校准套件。
这些适配器在新的时候可能没有随校准套件一起提供，因为套件所带的盒子只有选件100（母头3.5毫米到母头3.5毫米，P / N 85027-60005，不幸丢失了）。
据我所知，通过查看套件中的五个N / 3.5 mm适配器和安捷伦网站上的图片，适配器可能是*安捷伦的，部件号：N-m-型到3.5 mm
-m 1250-1743型-N-m-至3.5 mm -f 1250-1744 N型-f-至3.5 mm -f 1250-1745型-N -f-至3.5 mm -m 1250-1750
使用该套件的选项400，但正如我所说，套件内容没有列出这些部件，或选项400.我没有安装名称的5个适配器，可能是中文副本。
我有点怀疑是这样，因为质量非常高，但这并非不可能。
我可以想到几种方法，我可以检查这些适配器是否相位匹配，但想知道*最佳方式。
是否公布了Agilent适配器的电气延迟？
（我注意到这些适配器都是“11878A 50欧姆3.5毫米适配器套件”的一部分，但我没有看到该套件手册中有任何电气延迟。）我可以使用85032B N校准套件，
属于朋友，但如果需要，我可以借用它。
（我也有一个订单，但开始认为它永远不会到达）。
我有一个8720D VNA，它启用了选项010（TDR）。
我的初衷是：*使用3.5 mm套件校准VNA。
*如果我使用N cal套件，我知道http://na.tm.agilent.com/pna/caldefs/stddefs.html对男性短片的延迟是1.78E-11 s而女性短片的延迟是9.30
E-14 s *将未知适配器放在3,5毫米导线上。
*使用N短裤终止适配器。
*使用TDR模式（我从未使用过），找到反射的时间。
*如果在纠正N短路中的不同延迟后，短路+适配器的整体延迟总是相同的，那么我可以得出结论，适配器是相位匹配的。
我认为*这将达到6 GHz（N cal套件的极限），其中短路的电感可以忽略不计。
但是，如果我有一个更好的校准套件，并希望检查这些适配器到更高的频率，短路的电感不能忽略怎么办？
如果适配器是我认为的那样，那么它们的额定频率为18 GHz，尽管我无法访问任何校准套件。
那么最好的方法是什么？
戴夫



     以下为原文

  I have some 3.5 mm to N adapters

* 2 x Male N to female 3,5 mm
* 1 x Male N to male 3.5 mm
* 1 x Female N to male 3.5 mm
* 1 x Female N to female 3.5 mm

These adapters came with a 85033E 3.5 mm 9 GHz Calibration Kit I purchased used from eBay. These adapters were probably *not* supplied with the calibration kit when it was new, as the box the kit came in only has option 100 (female 3.5 mm to female 3.5 mm, P/N 85027-60005, which is unfortunately missing).  

As far as I can tell, from looking at the five N/3.5 mm adapters in the kits, and pictures on the Agilent web site, the adapters are *probably* Agilent ones, part numbers:  

Type-N -m- to 3.5 mm -m  1250-1743
Type-N -m- to 3.5 mm -f   1250-1744
Type-N -f- to 3.5 mm -f   1250-1745
Type-N -f- to 3.5 mm -m 1250-1750

which are supplied with option 400 for this kit, but as I said, the kit contents does not list these parts, or option 400.   

The 5 adapters I have do not have the Agilent name, and could be Chinese copies. I somewhat doubt this is so, as the quality is very high, but it is not impossible.  

I can think of a several ways I can probably check if these adapters are phase matched, but would like to know the *best* way.   

Is the electrical delay of the Agilent adapters published? (I note these adapters are all part of the "11878A 50 Ohm 3.5 mm Adapter Kit", but I don't see any mention of electrical delay in the manual for that kit.)  

I have access to an 85032B N calibration kit, which belongs to a friend, but I can borrow it if needed. (I also have one on order, but are begining to think it will never arrive). I have a 8720D VNA, which has option 010 (TDR) enabled.  

My inital thinking was:

* Calibrate the VNA with the 3.5 mm kit.  
* If I use the N cal kit, I know from http://na.tm.agilent.com/pna/caldefs/stddefs.html  the delay to the male short is 1.78E-11 s and to the female short is 9.30E-14 s  
* Put the unknown adapters on the 3,5 mm leads.  
* Terminate the adapters in N shorts.  
* Use the TDR mode (which I have never used), and find the time to the reflection.  
* If, after correcting for the different delays in the N shorts, the overall delay of shorts + adapters are always the same, then I can conclude the adapters are phase matched.  

I *think* this will work up to 6 GHz (the limit of the N cal kit), where the inductance of the shorts can be ignored. But what if I had a better cal kits, and wanted to check these adapters to a higher frequency, where the inductance of the shorts could not be ignored? If the adapters are what I think they are, then they are rated to 18 GHz, though none of the cal kits I have access to are.  

So what is the best way?  

Dave