[问答]

FOC是否支持F401和F411处理器

问答对人有帮助，内容完整，我也想知道答案 0 嗨，电机控制软件套件（STM32 PMSM FOC LIBv4.2）是否支持STM32F401，'411和'446处理器？当我尝试它时，它不允许CPU时钟的另一个选项超过168，据我所知，上述处理器支持84,100和180MHz。（由于我想要使用的''高级''功能，我似乎被推向了更高端的处理器，4xx系列。而且'405对我来说似乎有点过分了。以上来自于谷歌翻译以下为原文 Hi, Does the motor control software suite (STM32 PMSM FOC LIBv4.2) support STM32F401, '411 and '446 processors? When I tried it, it didn't allow another option for CPU clock than 168, and as far as I know the above processors support 84, 100 and 180MHz. (because of the ''advanced'' features that I want to use I seem to be pushed towards the higher end processors, the 4xx series. And a '405 seems overkill to me). 0
2019-2-26 10:56:21　　评论淘帖0 邀请回答您可以邀请以下用户，快速回答问题 × wang21cj 该类别下有 44 个回答。邀请回答新星之火12138 该类别下有 41 个回答。邀请回答 chm5 该类别下有 39 个回答。邀请回答 hgimtk 该类别下有 33 个回答。邀请回答 HengDu 该类别下有 30 个回答。邀请回答 hwp0415229 该类别下有 28 个回答。邀请回答 jghgfdssas 该类别下有 28 个回答。邀请回答颜刚YanG 该类别下有 26 个回答。邀请回答可口可甜该类别下有 26 个回答。邀请回答 kingnet6688 该类别下有 26 个回答。邀请回答 jenny042 该类别下有 25 个回答。邀请回答 kingnet9999 该类别下有 25 个回答。邀请回答 andyfly7 该类别下有 25 个回答。邀请回答麻酱该类别下有 25 个回答。邀请回答 zyh34997 该类别下有 25 个回答。邀请回答柱子图宁该类别下有 25 个回答。邀请回答云汉007 该类别下有 24 个回答。邀请回答 ggfvxv 该类别下有 24 个回答。邀请回答 heks 该类别下有 24 个回答。邀请回答 iyfhnvbn 该类别下有 24 个回答。邀请回答举报刘御相关推荐 • MSM8940处理器有哪些特点 4000 • 寻找手册中引用的F401和VL6180板的mbed资源 1822 • 如何基于OMAPL138处理器实现蓝牙+WiFi功能 1934 • RK3399处理器与AR9201处理器有哪些不同之处呢 2743 • RK3126处理器是什么？有何作用 3821 • 请教下MIPS32处理器是否支持256MB以上物理RAM？内核配置开了highmem还不能识别512MB 1929 • 请教坛内高手STM32F405的程序烧到F411上没用，该怎么改一下？ 4628 • 如何去识别STM32F401CCU6 / STM32F411CEU6核心板的真假呢 2700 • Core8051处理器有什么特点？ 2184 • MT7628处理器有哪些特点呢 3124 2个回答

答案对人有帮助，有参考价值 0 Ciao Roger 目前FOC库不支持F401和F411。再见梁咏琪以上来自于谷歌翻译以下为原文 Ciao Roger At the moment the F401 and F411 are not supported by the FOC library. Ciao Gigi

2019-2-26 11:15:16 评论举报张秀兰

答案对人有帮助，有参考价值 0 由于许多文档提到“这只有STM32F4xx作为处理器”，我认为这意味着支持所有或许多4xx系列。但事实上，在FOC SDK的发行说明中有一个“支持的处理器”，它提到了一些特定的F4xx处理器而没有别的。这是一个MC gui限制还是在F405和F411之间有足够的差异，FOC库的核心（没有来源）需要改变？从它在F3xx上运行的事实来看，72MHz显然已经足够了。 F411可以做得更好。库和外围设备之间是否存在需要更改的硬编码交互？（我愿意尝试手动修改MC gui生成的头文件，只要你说它有合理的成功机会......）附：该论坛有一个错误：在编辑帖子后，它不会崩溃“引用的消息”。以上来自于谷歌翻译以下为原文 As lots of documentation referred to ''this is available only with a STM32F4xx as processor'', I took that to mean that all or many of the 4xx family were supported. But indeed there is a ''supported processors'' in the release notes of the FOC SDK that mentions a few specific F4xx processors and nothing else. Is this an MC gui restriction or are there enough differences between F405 and say F411 that the core of the FOC library (no source) needs to be changed? From the fact that it runs on F3xx, 72MHz is apparently enough. F411 can do better. Are there hardcoded interactions between the library and peripherals that need changing? (I'm willing to attempt manually modifying the header files that MC gui produces, provided that you say that it has a reasonable chance of success....) P.S. The forum has a bug: it will not collapse the ''quoted messages'' after an edit of a post.

2019-2-26 11:28:58 评论举报刘御