对于基于8051的设计，是否有可行的Xilinx解决方案已经过时了？

也许：HTTP：//xgoogle.xilinx.com/search输出= xml_no_dtd＆安培，即= UTF-8和; OE = UTF-8＆安培;客户= iplocator＆安培; proxystylesheet = iplocator＆安培;站点= IPLocator＆安培;过滤器= 0＆安培; _ResultsView =标准＆安培;
NUM = 1000＆安培; q = 8051＆安培; as_q =安培; getfields = *＆安培; newSearch = HTTP：//www.xilinx.com/products/intellectual-prop ...
------------------------------------------“如果它不起作用
模拟，它不会在板上工作。“



以下为原文

Maybe:
http://xgoogle.xilinx.com/search?output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&client=iplocator&proxystylesheet=iplocator&site=IPLocator&filter=0&_ResultsView=Standard&num=1000&q=8051&as_q=&getfields=*&newSearch=http://www.xilinx.com/products/intellectual-prop...

------------------------------------------
"If it don't work in simulation, it won't work on the board."

如果您不需要保留对汇编程序或目标代码的投资，还应该查看MicroBlaze。
- 鲍勃埃尔金德
签名：新手的自述文件在这里：http：//forums.xilinx.com/t5/New-Users-Forum/README-first-Help-for-new-users/td-p/219369总结：1。
阅读手册或用户指南。
你读过手册了吗？
你能找到手册吗？2。
搜索论坛（并搜索网页）以寻找类似的主题。
不要在多个论坛上发布相同的问题。
不要在别人的主题上发布新主题或问题，开始新的主题！5。
学生：复制代码与学习设计不同.6“它不起作用”不是一个可以回答的问题。
提供有用的详细信息（请与网页，数据表链接）.7。
您的代码中的评论不需要支付额外费用。
我没有支付论坛帖子的费用。
如果我写一篇好文章，那么我一无所获。



以下为原文

If you don't need to preserve your investment in assembler or object code, you should also check out MicroBlaze.
 
-- Bob Elkind
SIGNATURE:
README for newbies is here: http://forums.xilinx.com/t5/New-Users-Forum/README-first-Help-for-new-users/td-p/219369

Summary:
1. Read the manual or user guide.  Have you read the manual? Can you find the manual?
2. Search the forums (and search the web) for similar topics.
3. Do not post the same question on multiple forums.
4. Do not post a new topic or question on someone else's thread, start a new thread!
5. Students: Copying code is not the same as learning to design.
6 "It does not work" is not a question which can be answered. Provide useful details (with webpage, datasheet links, please).
7. You are not charged extra fees for comments in your code.
8. I am not paid for forum posts.  If I write a good post, then I have been good for nothing.

forte31写道：
对于基于8051的设计，是否有可行的Xilinx解决方案已经过时了？
什么变得过时了？
我相信Silicon Labs会对你断言8051已经过时的问题提出异议。
----------------------------是的，我这样做是为了谋生。



以下为原文

forte31 wrote:
Is there a viable Xilinx solution for 8051 based designs that are becoming obsolete?

What is becoming obsolete?
 
I'm sure Silicon Labs would take issue with your assertion that the 8051 is obsolete.
----------------------------Yes, I do this for a living.