完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
扫一扫,分享给好友
嗨,
现在我下载一个网络Vivado。 我试图获得许可证,但我在Xilinx帐户上找不到它。 请参阅下面的附图。 你能告诉我如何为免费网络版Vivado生成许可证吗? Windows 10,64位SO。 谢谢, 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hi, Now I download a web Vivado. I try to get a license, but I cannot find it on my Xilinx account. Please see the attached picture below. Can you tell me how to generate a license for a free web version Vivado? Windows 10, 64bit SO. Thanks, |
|
相关推荐
8个回答
|
|
@robertwilliam,
你安装了Vivado 2016.x WebPACK吗? 如果是,则不需要许可证。 您可以在安装时选择WebPACK版本的Vivado,并在没有任何许可证的情况下使用它。 谢谢,Nupur ----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- Google在发布之前提问 。 如果某人的帖子回答了您的问题,请将帖子标记为“接受为解决方案”。 如果你看到一个特别好的和信息丰富的帖子,考虑给它Kudos(点击星标)。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 @robertwilliam, Have you installed Vivado 2016.x WebPACK ? If yes, it does not require a license. You can simply select WebPACK version of Vivado while installation and use that without any license. Thanks, Nupur -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Google your question before posting. If someone's post answers your question, mark the post as answer with "Accept as solution". If you see a particularly good and informative post, consider giving it Kudos (click on the star mark). |
|
|
|
嗨@ robertwilliam,
以前我们分别给了webpack许可证。 从2016年起,这是安装的一部分。 如果您使用的是Vivado 2016.x,那么您不需要许可证。 您可以使用有限的体系结构(Webpack支持的体系结构)。 有关Vivado 2016.3支持的webpack架构的信息,请访问http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/sw_manuals/xilinx2016_3/ug973-vivado-release-notes-install-license.pdf的第16页。 谢谢,Arpan ----------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -请注意- 如果提供的信息有用,请将答案标记为“接受为解决方案”。给予您认为有用且回复的帖子。感谢Kudos .-------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hi @robertwilliam, Previously we were giving webpack license separately. From 2016.x this is a part of the installation. If you are using Vivado 2016.x then you don't need a license. You can make use of limited architectures(Webpack supported architecture). Please go through page-16 of https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/sw_manuals/xilinx2016_3/ug973-vivado-release-notes-install-license.pdf for info about the supported webpack architectures for Vivado 2016.3 Thanks, Arpan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kindly note- Please mark the Answer as "Accept as solution" if information provided is helpful. Give Kudos to a post which you think is helpful and reply oriented. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
@robertwilliam,
您的查询是否已解决? 如果是,请通过将正确答案标记为“接受为解决方案”来关闭此主题。 谢谢,Nupur ----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- Google在发布之前提问 。 如果某人的帖子回答了您的问题,请将帖子标记为“接受为解决方案”。 如果你看到一个特别好的和信息丰富的帖子,考虑给它Kudos(点击星标)。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 @robertwilliam, Is your query addressed? If yes, please close this thread by marking the correct answer as "Accept as Solution". Thanks, Nupur -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Google your question before posting. If someone's post answers your question, mark the post as answer with "Accept as solution". If you see a particularly good and informative post, consider giving it Kudos (click on the star mark). |
|
|
|
在安装Vivado 2016.4以使用WebPACK后,许可证管理器将打开,并提供多种许可证的选择,包括WebPACK,但我无法使WebPACK许可证生成工作。
阅读此主题告诉我,我甚至不需要通过许可证生成,因此许可证管理器交互对于该情况非常用户敌意。 您至少应该在许可证管理器的选择对话框中添加一些文本,澄清对于WebPACK,没有必要请求许可证。 在我看来,这构成了一个错误,但根据您的标准,也许这是一个功能请求。 无论哪种方式,修复它将为使用WebPACK的客户节省大量的恶化。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Upon installing Vivado 2016.4 to use WebPACK, the License Manager is opened and offers selections of multiple kinds of licenses, including WebPACK, but I wasn't able to get WebPACK license generation to work. Reading this thread tells me that I don't even need to go through license generation, so the License Manager interaction is very user-hostile for that case. You really should at a minimum add some text to the License Manager's selection dialog clarifying that for WebPACK it isn't necessary to request a license. In my opinion, this constitutes a bug, but depending on your criteria, perhaps it is a feature request. Either way, fixing it will save a lot of aggravation for your customers who use WebPACK. |
|
|
|
嗨@骚动,
感谢您指出了这一点! 但访问网站从以下网址下载Vivado WebPACK:https://www.xilinx.com/support/download/index.html/content/xilinx/en/downloadNav/vivado-design-tools/2016-4.html我们可以看到 在重要信息部分,它被称为“免费许可”。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hi @brouhaha, Thanks for pointing that out! But upon visiting the website to download Vivado WebPACK from: https://www.xilinx.com/support/download/index.html/content/xilinx/en/downloadNav/vivado-design-tools/2016-4.html we can see in the important information section it is mentioned as 'License Free'. |
|
|
|
是的,我现在明白它是免许可证的。
问题是Vivado许可证管理器用户界面在安装后自动出现,并没有说清楚,事实上暗示相反! 该对话框显示WebPACK需要许可证,而尝试生成许可证则不起作用。 我浪费了一个多小时才通过网络搜索找到我应该跳过许可证生成。 需要修复许可证管理器对话框,以便它根本不提供WebPACK的许可证生成,因为它不是必需的,也不起作用。 请将此显示给您的用户界面/用户体验专家。 不,功能实际上并没有被破坏,但用户体验绝对是可怕的。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Yes, I now understand that it's license-free. The problem is that the Vivado license manager user interface, which appears automatically after installation, doesn't make that clear, and in fact suggests the opposite! The dialog makes it appear that a license is required for WebPACK, while attempting to generate the license doesn't work. I wasted over an hour on that before finding out by a web search that I should just skip the license generation. The license manager dialog needs to be fixed so that it doesn't offer license generation for WebPACK at all, since it isn't necessary and doesn't work. Please show this to your User Interface/User Experience experts. No, the functionality isn't actually broken, but the user experience is ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE. |
|
|
|
说得好。
我刚刚浪费了大量时间尝试获取WebPack许可证,因为许可证管理器中的措辞完全如您所说,我现在在2017.2。 为什么Xilinx在这类事情上如此糟糕? 罗格。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Well said. I've just wasted a load of time trying get a WebPack license because of the wording in the License Manager exactly as you said and I'm on 2017.2 now. Why is Xilinx so bad at this sort of thing? Rog. |
|
|
|
你好@ rogerwilsonand @骚动,
“在安装Vivado 2016.4以使用WebPACK后,许可证管理器将打开并提供多种许可证的选择,包括WebPACK” 请注意,VLM安装结束时打开的原因是您在安装阶段选择了这样做的选项。 有一个勾选框,询问用户是否要在安装结束时调用VLM。 如果保持勾选,则VLM会在安装过程结束时自动启动。 请注意,在VLM中,您会看到ISE WebPACK许可证的选项而不是Vivado(请参见下面的屏幕截图)。 对于ISE WebPACK工具,您仍需要ISE WebPACK许可证。 此外,对于Vivado 2016.x之前的任何Vivado WebPACK版本,您仍需要生成Vivado WebPACK许可证。 因此,仍然需要VLM中的此选项,并且无法将其删除。 希望以上是清楚的。 祝你今天愉快。 问候, 阿纳托利 亲切的问候,Anatoli Curran,Xilinx技术支持----------------------------------------- --------------------------------不要忘记回复,工作,并接受解决方案.---- -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hello @rogerwilson and @brouhaha, "Upon installing Vivado 2016.4 to use WebPACK, the License Manager is opened and offers selections of multiple kinds of licenses, including WebPACK" Please note that the reason why at the end of the installation VLM opens is because you've selected the option to do so at the installation stage. There is a tick box that asks the user if you'd like to invoke VLM at the end of the installation. If you keep this ticked, VLM automatically launches at the end of the installation process. Please note that in VLM you see an option for ISE WebPACK license not the Vivado (please see the screenshot below). For ISE WebPACK tool, you'd still need an ISE WebPACK license. And also, for any Vivado WebPACK editions prior Vivado 2016.x, you'd still need to generate a Vivado WebPACK license. Therefore, this option in VLM is still needed and can't be removed. Hope the above is clear. Have a nice day. Regards, Anatoli Kind Regards, Anatoli Curran, Xilinx Technical Support ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Don’t forget to reply, kudo, and accept as solution. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
2379 浏览 7 评论
2794 浏览 4 评论
Spartan 3-AN时钟和VHDL让ISE合成时出现错误该怎么办?
2261 浏览 9 评论
3335 浏览 0 评论
如何在RTL或xilinx spartan fpga的约束文件中插入1.56ns延迟缓冲区?
2427 浏览 15 评论
有输入,但是LVDS_25的FPGA内部接收不到数据,为什么?
755浏览 1评论
请问vc707的电源线是如何连接的,我这边可能出现了缺失元件的情况导致无法供电
543浏览 1评论
求一块XILINX开发板KC705,VC707,KC105和KCU1500
364浏览 1评论
1960浏览 0评论
681浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-11-22 07:06 , Processed in 1.338574 second(s), Total 92, Slave 75 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号