完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
成员我设计了一个微带贴片天线,我得到的结果约为-27db ....但是当我将地面层和参考端口添加到相同的布局时,结果会降低到-13 db .....可以任何人
帮帮我 ? 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 members i have designed a microstrip patch antenna and i am getting the results about -27db .... but when i add ground layer and a reference port to the same layout the results get decreased to -13 db ..... can anyone help me out ? |
|
相关推荐
3个回答
|
|
> {quote:title = johnny10写道:} {quote}>成员我设计了一个微带贴片天线,我得到的结果约为-27db ....但是当我将地面层和参考端口添加到相同的布局时
结果减少到-13分贝.....任何人都可以帮助我吗? 这可能是地平面尺寸的真实效果,或者它可能是您的模拟设置中的人工制品。 我们不知道,因为我们对您的Momentum模型一无所知。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 > {quote:title=johnny10 wrote:}{quote} > members i have designed a microstrip patch antenna and i am getting the results about -27db .... but when i add ground layer and a reference port to the same layout the results get decreased to -13 db ..... can anyone help me out ? This might be a true effect from ground plane size, or it might be an artefact from your simulation setup. We don't know, because we don't know anything about your Momentum model. |
|
|
|
lmksa 发表于 2018-10-23 08:59 1.sir m2是m1的结果......其余的数字属于有限的地面结构.... 2.当我今天重新设计它时,结果变得更好(我不知道如何......)。 地平面的长度和宽度不同,端口p3也随机放置。 你说这可能是由于地平面的大小......是否有任何数学表达式来决定地平面的大小? 那个港口在地面层的位置怎么样先生?编辑:johnny10于2015年1月17日上午9:56 m2.PNG9.7 KBm3.PNG22.1 KBm4.PNG9.2 KBm5.PNG7.8 KBm6.PNG10.6 KBm7.PNG4.0 KBm8.PNG5.2 KBm9.PNG12.1 KB 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 1.sir m2 is the result of m1.... and rest figures belong to finite ground structure.... 2.although when i redesigned it today the results got better ( I don't know how ..).only the ground plane is not of same length and breadth and the port p3 is also placed randomly by me. And u said it may be due to size of ground plane ... is there any mathematical expression to decide the size of ground plane ? and what about the position of the port on the ground layer sir ? Edited by: johnny10 on Jan 17, 2015 9:56 AM 附件
|
|
|
|
zym123456 发表于 2018-10-23 09:11 > {quote:title = johnny10写道:} {quote}>和端口p3也是我随机放置的。 随机放置接地引脚是个坏主意。 它确实改变了结果,因为它改变了返回电流的路径。 我会将接地引脚放在信号引脚下面。 要控制接地引脚的大小,可以使用边/区域引脚:http://muehlhaus.com/support/ads-application-notes/edge-area-pins>你说它可能是由于大小 地平面......是否有任何数学表达式来决定地平面的大小? 先生在地面层的位置怎么样? 对不起,我没有经验法则。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 > {quote:title=johnny10 wrote:}{quote} > and the port p3 is also placed randomly by me. Randomly placing the ground pin is a bad idea. It does change results, because it changes the path for the return current. I would place the ground pin under the signal pin. To control the size of the ground pin, you might use an edge/area pin: http://muehlhaus.com/support/ads-application-notes/edge-area-pins > And u said it may be due to size of ground plane ... is there any mathematical expression to decide the size of ground plane ? and what about the position of the port on the ground layer sir ? Sorry, I have no rule of thumb for that. |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
1251 浏览 0 评论
2360 浏览 1 评论
2173 浏览 1 评论
2041 浏览 5 评论
2925 浏览 3 评论
995浏览 1评论
关于Keysight x1149 Boundary Scan Analyzer
725浏览 0评论
N5230C用“CALC:MARK:BWID?”获取Bwid,Cent,Q,Loss失败,请问大佬们怎么解决呀
824浏览 0评论
1251浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-12-2 20:26 , Processed in 1.423039 second(s), Total 83, Slave 66 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号