RN4677 EEPROM存储器映射

RN467 7的内存映射与此文档中的内存映射相同：BM77 SPPCODER的应用说明：应用NOTEMBM7SPP03S3V25Y140805.PDFI在这个问题中找到了这个问题：http://WW1.Microchip .com／下载/ En/DeViceOC/BM77 %20配置%2工具%20和%20应用%20Note如果不知道历史，RN467将共享这个内存映射看起来很奇怪，但是代码注释和地址是相当接近的。一个地址似乎是1字节的。



      以下为原文

    Is the memory map for the RN4677 the same as the memory map in this doc:
Application Note of BM77SPP Controller:  Application Note_BM77SPP03_S3_v25_140805.pdf
 
I found this doc in the bowels of this:
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/BM77%20Configuration%20Tools%20and%20Application%20Notes.zip
 
Not knowing the history, it seems odd that the RN4677 would share this memory map, but the code comments and addresses are fairly close.  One address seems off by 1-byte.
 
Thoughts?

RN467是BM77的ASCII版本，所以并不完全出乎意料。



      以下为原文

    RN4677 is the ASCII Version of the The BM77 so not totally unexpected.

嗨，正如在Microchip网站上可以看到的，RN467是不推荐用于新设计的。你应该考虑RN467，它几乎是命令兼容的。它具有相同的足迹并增加安全性考虑。



      以下为原文

    Hi,
As can be seen on Microchip website, RN4677 is not recommended for new design.
You should maybe consider RN4678 which is almost command compatible. It has the same footprint and adds security
Regards

同意不推荐RN467，但我继承了一个使用它的项目，我正在尝试了解实际上用S命令配置的是什么。我们正在寻找一个更小的设备，所以RN467也不会。我们一直在尝试使用RN861（见我的另一个线程），但这并不是很好。我们需要配对的第三方设备使用不同的品牌模块，他们正在推动我们使用该设备。大小，它的一半之间的RN467 8和RN1478，所以它可能符合我们的目标机械信封。但我们有一个熟悉的RN-BT模块，从HW和SW的角度来看。如果我们不能得到RN861的工作，我们将不得不追求其他模块。



      以下为原文

    Agreed on not recommending the RN4677, but I've inherited a project that uses it and am trying to understand what is actually being configured with the S: command.
 
We are looking to go to a much smaller device, so the RN4678 won't do either.  We've been attempting to use the RN4871 (see my other thread), but that's not working out so well. 
 
The 3rd party device we need to pair with uses a different brand module and they are pushing us to use that device.  Size wise, it's half way between the RN4678 and the RN4871, so it might fit the mechanical envelope we're targeting.  But we have a some familiarity with the RN BT modules, both from a HW and SW perspective.  If we can't get the RN4871 working, we'll like have to pursue other modules.
 
Regards,
J