完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
嗨,快乐星期一,我正在建立一个.CSA州,并且在召回期间有一个纠正被打开的问题。
我已设置此通道来测量增益,输出功率和相位。 校准通道(STD测量类),在保存状态之前,在相位跟踪时关闭校正。 现在,在我保存此状态后,如果我执行相同状态的调用,则相位跟踪校正将重新打开。 这是不合需要的,因为我们倾向于在关闭相位校正的情况下获得更好的相对相位测量,尤其是在低功率下的大扫描范围内。 有没有办法让相位校正在召回时保持不变? N5245A,A.10.25.02建议表示赞赏 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hi, Happy Monday, I am setting up a .CSA state and having an issue with correction being turned ON during recall. I have setup this channel to measure gain, output power, and phase. The channel(STD measurement class) is calibrated and, before saving state, correction is turned OFF on phase trace. Now, immediately after I save this state, if I perform a recall of same state, phase trace correction is turned back ON. This is undesirable as we tend to get better relative phase measurements with phase correction turned off, especially so over large sweep range at low power. Is there a way make the phase correction stay off on recall? N5245A, A.10.25.02 Suggestions appreciated |
|
相关推荐
3个回答
|
|
基本上,简短的回答是:“这就是它的方式。”
但是,关于这是否应归类为错误似乎存在争议。 对于客户来说,一旦状态得到保存,它应该以完全相同的方式被召回,这当然是合理的。 这在过去并不是一个主要问题,但我当然理解这种行为令人沮丧。 我可以将此作为一个错误提交,但我不确定它会得到多少优先权。 我们的专家Joel也可能会在这里发声......他总是对这样的事情有一个看法。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Basically, the short answer is: "That's just the way it is." However, there seems to be some debate as to whether or not this should be classified as a bug. It is certainly reasonable for a customer to expect that once a state is saved, it should be recalled the exact same way. This has not been a major issue in the past, but I certainly understand some frustration with this behavior. I can submit this as a bug, but I am not sure it would get much priority. Our expert Joel may also chime in here later...he always has an opinion on things like this. |
|
|
|
胡bbs2 发表于 2018-10-22 13:11 值得的是 - 我确实认为这是一个错误,我已经讨论了类似的问题,在没有用户明确同意校准工程师的情况下,cal会自动打开(或更改校准类型)。 解决方案并不像看起来那么简单,但我们正试图在更大的背景下解决这个问题,让用户能够更好地控制各个测量的校正类型和状态。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 for what is worth - I do consider this a bug and I have discussed similar issues with cal getting automatically turned on (or cal type changed) without users' express consent with the calibration engineers. the solution is not as trivial as it might seem, but we are trying to address it in the bigger context of giving users more control over the type and state of corrections for individual measurements. |
|
|
|
胡bbs2 发表于 2018-10-22 13:11 感谢您的承认,至少现在我可以肯定我不只是错过了什么! 值得关注的是对德州之夜的关注。 最好的祝福 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Thank you for acknowledging, at least now I can be sure I wasn't just missing something! Keysight attention to this is appreciated. Best Regards |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
1067 浏览 0 评论
2305 浏览 1 评论
2092 浏览 1 评论
1966 浏览 5 评论
2837 浏览 3 评论
833浏览 1评论
关于Keysight x1149 Boundary Scan Analyzer
614浏览 0评论
N5230C用“CALC:MARK:BWID?”获取Bwid,Cent,Q,Loss失败,请问大佬们怎么解决呀
711浏览 0评论
1395浏览 0评论
1067浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-9-29 04:57 , Processed in 1.352992 second(s), Total 83, Slave 66 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号