什么是GRID的意思？

公平的问题，答案是任何人都在寻求企业虚拟化的加速。
通过虚拟化，我们要求CPU运行主机，为客户提供vCPU，管理所有资源，如存储和网络，然后使用VDI我们也要求它是GPU。
最后可以说是最糟糕的，因为GPU是大规模并行的，而CPU本质上是串行的，因此非常不同。
因此，VDI自发布以来就遭遇了不那么优化的最终用户体验，而GRID正在回应这一需求。
使管理员能够在虚拟化架构中共享或专用GPU，为他们增加了一个强大的资源来改变最终用户体验。
即使有知识工作者，也有公共应用程序，如谷歌地球，使用GPU运行得更好，而Office 2013现在正在利用图形加速。
也许更令人兴奋的是，GRID允许虚拟化应用程序，而这些应用程序之前根本不可能，使GRID成为3D游戏规则改变者以及需要GPU的类似强大图形应用程序。
通过虚拟化这些桌面和应用程序，您可以从非常昂贵的物理桌面解锁该关键用户并为其提供移动性BYOD，同时允许管理员集中数据，确保其安全。
这样做的好处并不止于此，例如，添加GPU可以改变密度数学，因为它可以减轻CPU的负担。
关于对一个人公司或家庭使用有意义的问题，足以让DaaS产品为他们的可用资源添加GPU。
正如您所说，它工作得很好，我们只是转向更加图形化的体验，GRID为这些图形带来了灵活性和自由度。



以下为原文

Fair question, the answer is anyone looking for acceleration in their enterprise virtualization.  With virtualization we ask the CPU to run the host, be vCPU's for the guests, manage all resources like storage and networking, and then with VDI we also ask it to be a GPU.  This last is arguably the worst as GPU's are massively parallel and CPU's serial in nature, so very different.  As a result, VDI has suffered since its onset with a less then optimal end user experience and GRID is answering that demand.  Giving admins the ability to share or dedicate GPU in a virtualized architecture adds a powerful resource for them to change the end user experience.  Even with Knowledge workers there are commons apps such as Google Earth that run far better with GPU, and Office 2013 is leveraging graphics acceleration now.  Maybe more exciting, GRID allows the virtualization of applications that before simply could not be, making GRID a game changer for 3D and similar intensely graphical applications that demand GPU.  By virtualizing those desktops and applications you unchain that critical user from a very expensive physical desktop and give them mobility, BYOD, while allowing the admins to centralize data, keep it secure.  The benefits don't end there, as an example, adding GPU changes your density math as it takes workload off the CPU.  To your question about making sense for one person companies or home use, enough so that DaaS offerings are adding GPU to their available resources.  As you said, it works great, and we are only moving towards a more graphical experience and GRID brings flexibility and freedom to those graphics.

我设置了第一个完全虚拟的设计＆amp;
在推出GRID和Citrix Xen7背后的工程咨询。
我经营传统的工程咨询公司，但总是受到我在办公室地理位置吸引的团队的限制，以及拥有数千平方英尺的办公空间以容纳每个人的成本。
我们在2014年初推出，并通过福音传播向客户展示我们使用CAD和分析工程师和软件提供设计解决方案的方式，来自我在英国各地的团队，以最优惠的价格为他们提供最佳结果，因为我没有
得到了巨大的开销。
这不是“一人”操作的解决方案，因为投资和持续成本太高，但实施这种工作方式的成本也不是蓝筹领域。
我每个月在办公室，办公桌，咖啡等上存的钱 - 更不用说耗电量（紫杉我们现在也是一个环保企业）对于正在进行的开发有很长的路要走。
我的业务建立在GRID技术基础上 - 我没有失望。



以下为原文

I setup the first fully virtual Design & Engineering consultancy on the back of the launch of GRID and Citrix Xen7. I have ran traditional engineering consultancies but always been restricted by the team I could attract geographically located to my office and also the cost of having thousands of square feet of office space to house everyone in.

We launched in the start of 2014 and have been evangelically showing customers the way we deliver design solutions using CAD and Analysis engineers and software, from a team I have across the UK, gives them the best results at the best price as I haven’t got to pass on huge overheads.

This is not a solution for a “one man” operation as the investment and ongoing costs would be too great, however the cost to implement this way of working is not Blue Chip territory either. The money I save each month on offices, desks, coffee etc – not to mention power consumption (yew we are an environmentally friendly business now too) goes a long way towards the ongoing development.

My business is built on GRID technology – I wasn’t disappointed.

GRID和GPU通过 - 依赖于图形卡
你好，
我正在寻找一种解决方案，虚拟化包含不同GPU消费应用程序的多个VM。
与此网格概念的一般焦点相反，在我们的设置中，一次只运行一个VM，我们可以将监视器直接插入图形卡。
此外，我们还有一些空间，供暖和功率限制，因此Grid K1或K2不适合我们的方法。
在一些论坛中，我认为GPU通过也可能是nVidia Quadro，但似乎不是直截了当。
我对这个话题不太感兴趣，所以我有几个问题：
[名单]
根据nVidia驱动程序的发行说明，Quadro K2000，K4000等也可以实现GPU直通。我可以依赖它吗？
使用的虚拟化解决方案（XenServer，VMWare等）与图形卡之间是否存在依赖关系？
KVM也可以使用网格技术吗？



以下为原文

GRID and GPU pass through – dependence on graphic card
Hello,
I‘m looking for a solution, virtualizing several VMs which contain different GPU consuming applications. In contrast to the general focus of this grid concept, in our setup only one VM is running at a time and we could plug the monitor directly to the graphic card. In addition we have some space, heating and power restrictions, so the Grid K1 or K2 is no option for our approach.
I red in some forums that the GPU pass through is possible also for the nVidia Quadro but it seems not to be straight forward. I am somehow new to this topic and so I have several questions:

According to the release note of the nVidia driver, GPU passthrough is also possible for Quadro K2000, K4000, etc. Can I rely on that?
Is there dependence between the used virtualization solution (XenServer, VMWare, etc) and the graphic card?
Is the grid technology also possible for KVM?