完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
>我在Vee7.5的帮助文件中找到了一个有趣的东西,当查找> for .NET并小心然后接受> COM对象。这说明了关于自动接口生成器的内容。警告说生成事件的线程和
对象创建者线程不一样。 我不明白为什么这对VEE来说是一个问题,但显然是出于某种原因。 通常的做法是创建生成要传递的事件的回调线程 - 实际上,这是实现计时器事件的第一种方式之一。我想我的意思是我不太了解.NET以了解为什么会这样做 成为问题。-SHAWN ----如需订阅,请发送电子邮件至:“vrf-request@lists.it.agilent.com”,邮件正文中包含“subscribe”字样。要取消订阅,请发送空白电子邮件至“ vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com“。要向此邮件列表发送邮件,请发送电子邮件至”vrf@agilent.com“。 如果您需要有关邮件列表的帮助,请发送邮件至“owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com”。在“www.oswegosw.com/vrf_archive/”上搜索“非官方vrf档案”。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 > I have found an interesting thing in > the Help file of Vee7.5 when looking > for .NET and caution and then take > COM objects. This says stuff about the automatic interface generator. The caution says the thread that generated an event and the object creator thread are not the same. I don't see why this would be a problem for VEE but apparently it is for some reason. It's common practice to create callback threads that generate events to pass on - in fact, that was one of the first ways to implement timer events. I guess what I mean is that I don't understand enough about .NET to understand why this would be a problem. -SHAWN- --- To subscribe please send an email to: "vrf-request@lists.it.agilent.com" with the word subscribe in the message body. To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com". To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@agilent.com". If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com". Search the "unofficial vrf archive" at "www.oswegosw.com/vrf_archive/". |
|
相关推荐
2个回答
|
|
---要订阅,请发送电子邮件至:“vrf-request@lists.it.agilent.com”,邮件正文中包含subscribe一词。
要取消订阅,请发送一封空白电子邮件至“leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com”。 要将邮件发送到此邮件列表,请发送电子邮件至“vrf@agilent.com”。 如果您需要有关邮件列表的帮助,请发送邮件至“owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com”。 在“www.oswegosw.com/vrf_archive/”上搜索“unofficial vrf archive”。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 --- To subscribe please send an email to: "vrf-request@lists.it.agilent.com" with the word subscribe in the message body. To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com". To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@agilent.com". If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com". Search the "unofficial vrf archive" at "www.oswegosw.com/vrf_archive/". |
|
|
|
>我在Vee7.5的帮助文件中找到了一个有趣的东西,当查找> for .NET并小心然后接受> COM对象。这说明了关于自动接口生成器的内容。警告说生成事件的线程和
对象creatorthread不一样。 我不明白为什么这对VEE来说是一个问题,但显然是出于某种原因。 通常的做法是创建生成要传递的事件的回调线程 - 事实上,这是实现定时器事件的第一步。我想我的意思是我不太了解.NET了解为什么这会是一个问题 。-SHAWN ----您目前订阅了vrf:r***@soco.agilent.com要订阅,请发送电子邮件至:“vrf-request@lists.it.agilent.com”,邮件正文中包含subscribe一词 。要取消订阅,请发送空白电子邮件至“leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com”。要向此邮件列表发送邮件,请发送电子邮件至“vrf@agilent.com”。 如果您需要有关邮件列表的帮助,请发送邮件至“owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com”。在“www.oswegosw.com/vrf_archive/”上搜索“非官方vrf档案”。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 > I have found an interesting thing in > the Help file of Vee7.5 when looking > for .NET and caution and then take > COM objects. This says stuff about the automatic interface generator. The caution says the thread that generated an event and the object creator thread are not the same. I don't see why this would be a problem for VEE but apparently it is for some reason. It's common practice to create callback threads that generate events to pass on - in fact, that was one of the first ways to implement timer events. I guess what I mean is that I don't understand enough about .NET to understand why this would be a problem. -SHAWN- --- You are currently subscribed to vrf as: [email=r***@soco.agilent.com]r***@soco.agilent.com[/email] To subscribe please send an email to: "vrf-request@lists.it.agilent.com" with the word subscribe in the message body. To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com". To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@agilent.com". If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com". Search the "unofficial vrf archive" at "www.oswegosw.com/vrf_archive/". |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
1229 浏览 0 评论
2350 浏览 1 评论
2160 浏览 1 评论
2026 浏览 5 评论
2908 浏览 3 评论
973浏览 1评论
关于Keysight x1149 Boundary Scan Analyzer
707浏览 0评论
N5230C用“CALC:MARK:BWID?”获取Bwid,Cent,Q,Loss失败,请问大佬们怎么解决呀
808浏览 0评论
1229浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-11-25 15:11 , Processed in 1.413850 second(s), Total 82, Slave 63 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号