不支持与PSOC1相同的动态重新配置,
在IDE中定义和切换配置之间的能力。
PSoC3/ 5更复杂,跟踪Turin重新配置的所有交互,而“活”。
可以证明这是一个挑战。当然,PSoC3/ 5器件的结构类似。
通过编写内部寄存器,因此存在相同的基本能力。
但是,正如我提到的,目前还没有设计工具来支持这一点。
所以如果你试图沿着那条路走下去,这将是一个手工过程。
当做,
汤姆莫克森
www. MxOn.com
www. www.
以上来自于百度翻译
以下为原文
Dynamic Reconfiguration is not supported the same way as in PSoC1,
with the capability in the IDE to define and switch between configurations.
PSoC3/5 is much more complex, and tracking all the interactions of tryin reconfigure while "live"
could prove to be a challange. Of course, the configuration of the PSoC3/5 devices are similarly
by writing internal registers, and so the same basic capability exists.
But, as I mentioned, no design tools exist for supporting this at the moment.
So it will be a manual process if you try to go down that road...
regards,
Tom Moxon
www.moxon.com
www.westmarkco.com
不支持与PSOC1相同的动态重新配置,
在IDE中定义和切换配置之间的能力。
PSoC3/ 5更复杂,跟踪Turin重新配置的所有交互,而“活”。
可以证明这是一个挑战。当然,PSoC3/ 5器件的结构类似。
通过编写内部寄存器,因此存在相同的基本能力。
但是,正如我提到的,目前还没有设计工具来支持这一点。
所以如果你试图沿着那条路走下去,这将是一个手工过程。
当做,
汤姆莫克森
www. MxOn.com
www. www.
以上来自于百度翻译
以下为原文
Dynamic Reconfiguration is not supported the same way as in PSoC1,
with the capability in the IDE to define and switch between configurations.
PSoC3/5 is much more complex, and tracking all the interactions of tryin reconfigure while "live"
could prove to be a challange. Of course, the configuration of the PSoC3/5 devices are similarly
by writing internal registers, and so the same basic capability exists.
But, as I mentioned, no design tools exist for supporting this at the moment.
So it will be a manual process if you try to go down that road...
regards,
Tom Moxon
www.moxon.com
www.westmarkco.com
举报