你好
是的，许可模式的引入并不是最受欢迎的事情，我认为没有人会否认这一点，特别是因为物理GPU也比它们的前辈更贵。
你是对的，M60和K2之间存在很大差异。
对于初学者来说，一个是在Quadro板上构建的，另一个是特斯拉。
然后是会话密度和性能的相当大的增加。
你可以用更少的物质资源做更多的事情，这是我们都想做的事情，对吧？
如果您想最大化M60投资，显然需要使用RDS / XenApp，而不是纯VDI。
更好的密度和整体硬件利用率。
关于EDU的折扣，请与GRID经销商联系以获取最新信息;-)
只是一些个人建议......我强烈建议您不要在此阶段购买K1 / K2 GPU，未来的驱动程序开发将受到限制，您将遇到Hypervisor版本限制。
XenServer 7.1和vSphere 6.5是支持K1 / K2 GPU的最新Hypervisor版本......如果您现在购买这些版本，除非它们用于R＆amp; D或某种Dev，否则您将浪费资金。
问候
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Hi
Yes, the introduction of the licensing model is not the most popular thing to have been done, I don't think anyone will deny that, especially as the physical GPUs are also more expensive than their predecessors. You're right though, there are substantial differences between an M60 and a K2. For starters, one was built on a Quadro board, the other is a Tesla. Then there's the rather large increase in session density and performance. You can do (a lot) more, with less physical resource, which is what we're all trying to do, right?
If you want to maximise your M60 investment, obviously subject to use case, rather than pure VDI, look to use RDS / XenApp. Much better density and overall hardware utilisation.
Regarding discounts for EDU, please speak to a GRID reseller for the most up to date information ;-)
Just a bit of personal advice ... I would strongly recommend you do not purchase K1 / K2 GPUs at this stage, future driver development will be limited and you will run in to Hypervisor version limitations. XenServer 7.1 and vSphere 6.5 are the last Hypervisor versions to support K1 / K2 GPUs ... If you purchase these now, unless they're for R&D or some sort of Dev, you'll be throwing your money away.
Regards
你好
是的，许可模式的引入并不是最受欢迎的事情，我认为没有人会否认这一点，特别是因为物理GPU也比它们的前辈更贵。
你是对的，M60和K2之间存在很大差异。
对于初学者来说，一个是在Quadro板上构建的，另一个是特斯拉。
然后是会话密度和性能的相当大的增加。
你可以用更少的物质资源做更多的事情，这是我们都想做的事情，对吧？
如果您想最大化M60投资，显然需要使用RDS / XenApp，而不是纯VDI。
更好的密度和整体硬件利用率。
关于EDU的折扣，请与GRID经销商联系以获取最新信息;-)
只是一些个人建议......我强烈建议您不要在此阶段购买K1 / K2 GPU，未来的驱动程序开发将受到限制，您将遇到Hypervisor版本限制。
XenServer 7.1和vSphere 6.5是支持K1 / K2 GPU的最新Hypervisor版本......如果您现在购买这些版本，除非它们用于R＆amp; D或某种Dev，否则您将浪费资金。
问候
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Hi
Yes, the introduction of the licensing model is not the most popular thing to have been done, I don't think anyone will deny that, especially as the physical GPUs are also more expensive than their predecessors. You're right though, there are substantial differences between an M60 and a K2. For starters, one was built on a Quadro board, the other is a Tesla. Then there's the rather large increase in session density and performance. You can do (a lot) more, with less physical resource, which is what we're all trying to do, right?
If you want to maximise your M60 investment, obviously subject to use case, rather than pure VDI, look to use RDS / XenApp. Much better density and overall hardware utilisation.
Regarding discounts for EDU, please speak to a GRID reseller for the most up to date information ;-)
Just a bit of personal advice ... I would strongly recommend you do not purchase K1 / K2 GPUs at this stage, future driver development will be limited and you will run in to Hypervisor version limitations. XenServer 7.1 and vSphere 6.5 are the last Hypervisor versions to support K1 / K2 GPUs ... If you purchase these now, unless they're for R&D or some sort of Dev, you'll be throwing your money away.
Regards
举报
