85130C适配器怎么设置测量

使用合适的N型量具套件，标称规格为+ .0000 / -.003英寸。
对于所有连接器，您不希望任何标称的正向突出。
如果您在安捷伦的网站上查看微波连接器护理指南。
对于所有N型，SMA和3.5 mm连接器，它包含您在此主题上所需的所有信息。



     以下为原文

  With a proper type N gage kit, the specification from nominal is +.0000/ -.003 inch.   With all connectors you do not want any positive protrusion from nominal.   If you look on Agilent's website for the Microwave Connector Care Guide.  It has all the information you need on this subject for all Type N, SMA, and 3.5 mm connectors.

是的，+ .0000 / -.003英寸很好。
我认为，引脚深度会更加紧凑。
当我检查85054B calkit规格时，7mm到Type-N适配器的引脚深度指定为+.0000 / - .0005英寸+/-量具测量不确定度



     以下为原文

  Yes, +.0000/ -.003 inch is fine. I think, that pin depth would be even more tighter. When i checked 85054B calkit specs, pin depth for 7mm to Type-N adapters were specified +.0000/-.0005 inch +/- gage measurement uncertainty

特别是在具有较旧calkits的N型上，凹形开口的深度对于源匹配规范是至关重要的，因为它没有中心引脚扩展器。



     以下为原文

  particularly on type N with older calkits, the depth of the female open is critical to the source match specification, as it does not have a center pin extender.

是的，但是女性开口的针脚深度如何影响我关于那些7mm-Type-N适配器针脚深度的问题.....或者我没有正确理解这一点？！



     以下为原文

  Yes, but how female open's pin depth influences for my question about those 7mm- Type-N adapters pin depths.....or i didn't understood this point correctly?!

您的测试或校准平面端口是什么？
如果您从N型调整到7 mm，那么在校准7 mm后，N型针脚的深度根本不重要，只要它不会突出到损坏连接器。
如果你的VNA是7毫米而你使用7毫米的N型适配器，那么N型适配器必须符合calkit的期望。
如果校准套件是高频类型之一，那么它具有用于开路和短路的引脚延长器，并且对于第一顺序，引脚间隙通过校准来补偿。
但是，如果您正在寻找计量等级测量，您必须非常小心如何处理引脚间隙，这就是为什么精密套件与非精密套件相比具有更小的间隙变化的原因。



     以下为原文

  What will be your test or calibration plane port?  If you are adapting from type N to 7 mm, then the pin depth of the type N won't matter at all, after calibrating in 7 mm, provided it doesn't protrude so far as to damage the connector.

If your VNA is 7 mm and you use a 7 mm to type N adapter, then the type N adapter must match the calkit expectation.  If the cal kit is one of the high frequency kind, then it has pin extenders for opens and shorts, and to the first order, the pin gap is compensated by the calibration.  

However, if you are looking for metrology grade measurements, you have to be quite careful how to handle the pin-gap, which is why the precision kits have less gap variation then the non-precision kits.

好的，我有8510C（0.045-26.5GHz测试装置）分析仪，两个端口都配有3.5mm-NMD 3.5mm（m）测试端口电缆。
当我需要校准Type-N连接器m-f DUT时，85130C适配器套件将非常适用于此目的。
我有很多关于85054B calkit的经验以及如何测量它们。
我的观点是，85054B calkit的7mm到Type-N连接器引脚深度与85130C设置适配器相比有多接近。
现在我没有3.5mm到7mm的测试端口电缆，我将直接使用85054B calkit适配器。



     以下为原文

  Ok, I have 8510C (0.045-26.5GHz test set) analyzer with 3.5mm-NMD 3.5mm (m) testport cables on both ports. That 85130C adapter kit would be just ideal for this purpose, when i want calibrate Type-N connectorized m-f DUT's. I have lot of experience about 85054B calkit and how to gage them. My point was, that how close 85054B calkit's 7mm to Type-N connectors pin depth's are comparing for 85130C set adapters. Right now i don't have 3.5mm to 7mm test port cables, which i would use with 85054B calkit adapters directly.