XC8 v1.44如何报告设备包含文件中的错误？

你好！我目前在移植+增强为26K22到25K42I编写的固件不能获得UART1 TX中断标志，所以我认为我的代码中有一个bug。相反，代码的遗留部分就在那里，因为包含文件中有一个bug。产生任何错误，这是错误的，因为正确的位是U1TXIF，它在寄存器PiR3中。查看设备中包含的文件显示了这一点，我猜想它是这样写的，所以代码在家庭之间是可移植的，事实上第三结构在26K22包含文件中，在252中。5包含文件，但在这种情况下，它是错误的。我记得在编写代码时看到了其他错误，但是没有注意到，因为它们更明显。而且，这是对数据表的批判，这仍然是“初步的”，命名约定有很多不同之处，这是我不理解的。立…例如，TMR2类型定时器中的“定时器”位被命名为“on”和“txon”，在TMR1类型定时器中，它被命名为“on”和“tMR1on”，在tMR0定时器中是“EN”和“T0EN”等。使用单一命名约定的IMHO将是最好的东西，但那就是我。



      以下为原文

    Hi!
I'm currently working on porting + enhancing a firmware written for 26k22 to 25k42

I wasn't able to get the UART1 TX interrupt flag to set so i thought there was a bug in my code.

Instead, a legacy portion of code was sitting there, because of a bug in the include file..
I can write PIR1bits.TXIF without generating any errors, which is wrong because the correct bit is U1TXIF and it is in register PIR3.

Looking at the device include file shows this

typedef union {
    struct {
        unsigned INT0IF                 :1;
        unsigned ZCDIF                  :1;
        unsigned ADIF                   :1;
        unsigned ADTIF                  :1;
        unsigned C1IF                   :1;
        unsigned SMT1IF                 :1;
        unsigned SMT1PRAIF              :1;
        unsigned SMT1PWAIF              :1;
    };
    struct {
        unsigned                        :4;
        unsigned TX1IF                  :1;
        unsigned RC1IF                  :1;
        unsigned                        :1;
        unsigned PSPIF                  :1;
    };
    struct {
        unsigned                        :4;
        unsigned TXIF                   :1;
    };
} PIR1bits_t;

I suppose it's written like this so the code is portable between families, infact the third structure is there in the 26k22 include file AND in the 2525 include file, but in this case, it's wrong.
I recall seeing other errors like this while writing code but didn't take note because they were more obvious.

Also, and that's a critique to the datasheet, which is still "preliminary", there are many differences in naming conventions, which i don't understand.. For example the "Timer On" bit in TMR2 type timers is named "ON" and "TxON", in TMR1 type timers it is named "ON" and "TMR1ON" and in TMR0 timers it is "EN" and "T0EN" and other of such things..

IMHO using a single naming convention would be the best thing, but that's me