The Dads Club at my son’s high school usually puts on a good monthly meeting, with lots of carbohydrates, beverages and a good speaker. But when I heard that the Technology Director was going to present on why they were going to convert the library (a.k.a. the Information Commons) to an “Innovation Commons”, like a lot of dads my age I grabbed my pitchfork and torch and heading off downtown, determined to save the books. But what I heard caused me to pause and consider for a moment how we prepare our young people for tomorrow.
The debate was started, as are many debates, by the availability of money: specifically a grant to improve technology in High Schools (in the US, High School for young people aged 14-18). Our High School (Brophy College Prep) had adopted the principle of tablet computers for students over 12 years ago, gradually evolving to an iPad program over the years. Therefore, any upgrade to technology in the school had to go beyond simply ARMing students with technology. With their smart phones, most of our kids carry the content of an entire encyclopedia set in their pockets (for younger readers, think of Wikipedia printed out in a set of books) so schools can afford to spend less time on having students memorize facts, and more time on teaching them how to actually use knowledge.
An initiative by a former Brophy student got the school faculty thinking about how to go beyond teaching how to use technology and to stimulate students to think about what technology can be used for. Mick Ebeling is the founder of Not Impossible Labs and he and his company have engaged in some really amazing humanitarian work (such as Project Daniel, the world's first 3D printing prosthetic lab, which serves amputees in Sudan – see the video HERE). Or take the case of SOCCKET: The Energy-Harnessing Soccer Ball. Developed by a group of young people, the Soccket ball contains a charging generator and a battery so that 30 minutes of play generates enough energy to power an LED lamp for three hours, a boon in developing countries around the world.
The technology is great, but it is what young people are doing with the technology that is magnificent.
So how do we play a part in helping our young people go beyond being simply users of technology to being innovators who use technology? Intel takes their role in this seriously – Brophy students first learned about Not Impossible Labs while participating at Intel’s International Science and Engineering Fair. Indeed my youngest son spent the weekend polishing up his science fair project for the IEEE High School Science & Engineering Invitational event in Phoenix in May which has a large local Intel involvement.
Here at ON Semiconductor we do our bit - a couple of weekends ago, my colleague Cole and I spent Saturday supporting Avnet’s Tech Games, a series of fun, competitive events to encourage innovation and skill in local college and university students. I also have several colleagues who are active mentors in Elementary schools in the Lego FIRST robotics events.
So my question is, what role do technology companies need to play in encouraging the art and skill of innovation in our young people? Is it a task best left to the school system or should technology companies be active participants both in terms of finance and resources?