怎么加速零跨度模式下的数据传输

以二进制格式传输数据几乎肯定会比ascii快。
您可以尝试浮点（4字节）或双（8字节），看看哪个更快。
权衡是FieldFox在内部将数据存储为double，因此当float需要传输更少的字节（1/2！）时，由于需要进行内部转换，因此它可能仍然较慢。
Ascii方法需要更耗时的转换，并且导致数据多于双倍，因此通常是最慢的选项。
最快的选项最终取决于您的网络速度和要传输的数据长度。
您最好的选择是在您的特定情况下尝试每一个。
FORM：DATA REAL，32或FORM：DATA REAL，64将分别给出float和double结果。
默认情况下，FieldFox返回little-endian二进制数据，这是最快的，因为它匹配内部表示。
如果您需要在目标计算机上使用不同的字节顺序，并且需要最佳性能，我建议在该端交换字节，并避免使用FieldFox的FORM：BORD命令（可以在FieldFox上进行转换）。
会



     以下为原文

  Transferring the data in binary format will almost certainly be faster than ascii. You can try both float (4-byte) or double (8-byte) and see which is faster.  The tradeoff is that FieldFox stores the data internally as double, so while float will need to transfer fewer bytes (1/2!), it may still be slower as an internal conversion is necessary.  The Ascii method requires an even more time consuming conversion, and results in more data than double, so is generally the slowest option.  The fastest option will ultimately depend on your network speed and the length of the data to be transferred.  Your best bet is to try each in your particular situation.

FORM:DATA REAL,32     or
FORM:DATA REAL,64

will give float and double results, respectively.  By default FieldFox returns little-endian binary data, and this is the fastest as this matches the internal representation.  If you need a different byte order on the destination machine, and you need the best performance, I recommend swapping bytes on that end, and avoiding FieldFox's FORM:BORD command (which can do the conversion on the FieldFox).

Wil