完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
电子发烧友论坛|
在8568B上有2个信号输入。
对于选项001,你得到一个75欧姆的BNC用于输入1.内部有一个50/75欧姆的MLP来提供阻抗匹配,我认为如果该单元具有提升阻抗的选择,CPU会告知IF变量增益 增益约5.7 dB以补偿MLP损失。 我有一个当前面板校准器将N型输入2设置为-10.0 dBm时,如果校准器(50欧姆?)连接到输入1(75欧姆),是否会有很大差异? 我估计可能是+1.6 dB。 这个显示-6.9 dBm的读数。 其他校准器和75欧姆输入不匹配的情况可以忽略不计或是否有调整(除了前面板Amptd Cal?SteveEdited:S。Reeves于2015年5月1日上午9:03 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 On the 8568B there are 2 signal inputs. For option 001, you get a 75 ohm BNC for Input 1. There is a 50/75 ohm MLP inside to provide impedance matching and I would think the IF variable gain is told by the CPU's if the unit has that option to bump up the gain about 5.7 dB to compensate for the MLP loss. I have one that when the type N Input 2 is set up with the front panel calibrator to -10.0 dBm, should there be a big difference if the calibrator (50 ohm?) is connected to Input 1 (75 ohm).? I estimate maybe +1.6 dB. This one shows a reading of -6.9 dBm. Other having a mismatch of the calibrator and 75 ohm input, is this negligible or is there an adjustment for this (other than the front panel Amptd Cal ? Steve Edited by: S. Reeves on May 1, 2015 9:03 AM |
|
相关推荐
1个回答
|
|
|
嗨,通常,校准由50个连接器(输入2)完成,您不需要校准75欧姆端口1.根据设计,它是一个最小损耗焊盘,在整个频段内具有非常好的平坦度,并且通过软件控制补偿损耗
(固件)......你没有做过调整。 如果输入1(75欧姆)的损耗不正确,请验证最小损耗垫。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Hi, normally, calibration is done by 50 connector (input 2), you don't need to calibrate 75 Ohms port 1. By design, it's a minimum loss pad with very good flatness across the band, and loss is compensated by software control (firmware)...you don't have adjusment to do for that. If the loss at input 1 (75 Ohms) is incorrect, verify the minimum loss pad. |
|
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
1844 浏览 0 评论
2739 浏览 1 评论
2640 浏览 1 评论
2449 浏览 5 评论
3458 浏览 3 评论
1845浏览 0评论
417浏览 0评论
/9
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2025-12-2 08:20 , Processed in 0.801324 second(s), Total 74, Slave 57 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191

淘帖
1431