完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
我最近注意到,越来越多的AVR相关线程被创建在各种论坛,例如通信论坛)。我认为这是很好的发生,但我担心新用户可能被引导到这些论坛与AVR类型的问题,搜索现有POSTS的答案(震惊恐怖-但它可能会发生!!!!)并得到完全混淆和不正确的信息,因为到目前为止,一切都是指向PIC MCU和信息可能或可能不相关。更糟糕的是,不适当的建议可能会给予新的问题,其中的架构还不够清楚。RE已经以不同的方式组合在一起,我认为这对于论坛版主来说是一个很好的建议,他们创建一个AVR组(或组)并在合适的论坛中创建。然后他们可以在PIC论坛上做同样的事情(任何结构都可能比现在的不可理解的更好)。然后,在某个阶段,这可以传递给微芯片作为建议。苏珊
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 I have noticed recently that there are an increasing number of AVR related threads being created in various forums, e.g. the Communications forum). I think it is great that this is occurring but I'm concerned that new users might be directed to these forums with AVR-type questions, search existing posts for answers (shock horror - but it might happen!!!) and get totally confusing and incorrect information because everything so far has been directed towards the PIC MCUs and the information may or may not be relevant. Worse still, inappropriate advice might be given to new questions where the architecture has not been made clear enough. As the forums are already grouped together in various ways, I was thinking that it might be a good suggestion to the forum moderators that they create an AVR group (or groups) and create within that appropriate forums. They can then do the same with the PIC forums (any structure would probably be better than the sometimes incomprehensible one that there is now). Just putting this up for discussion - and for bringing forward better ideas. Then at some stage this can be passed on to Microchip as a suggestion. Susan |
|
相关推荐
9个回答
|
|
苏珊,你真的在向论坛管理员建议什么吗?
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 Susan, are you *really* suggesting something to forum administrators? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
请不要。论坛已经一团糟。我宁愿把所有的东西搬到Atmel社区…嘿,这是个好主意。
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 Please don't. Forum is already a mess. I'd rather have everything moved to ATMEL community.. ... hey that IS a good idea. |
|
|
|
问题是,人们已经在这里张贴了,必须做些事情来避免混乱。把所有的东西搬到Atmel社区可能也不是一个好主意,如果最后搞乱了Atmel怎么办?
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 The problem, people are already posting here, something has to be done to avoid confusion. Moving everything to ATMEL community might not be also a good idea, what if it end up messing up ATMEL? |
|
|
|
ImHo应该有一个唯一的平台,Atmel社区似乎不那么糟糕/破碎。在那里我会把东西分开:微芯片块、Atmel块、DeVoots块、其他块(线性、电源、COMM、……)。
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 IMHO there should be an only platform, and ATMEL community seems to be less awful/broken. There i would keep things separated: the MICROCHIP block, the ATMEL block, the DEVTOOLS block, the OTHER STUFF block (linear, power, comm, ...) |
|
|
|
大师们即将来临,许多公告往往会在那里发生。
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 Masters is imminent, many announcements tend to happen there. |
|
|
|
嗨,我想至少有一些微芯片(和Atmel)的人已经意识到这一点。这个论坛有超过一百万条消息,据我所知,AVFRFACK论坛至少是一样大的。任何中断链接到消息的改变肯定会引起很多挫折,甚至比愤怒的成员更愤怒。JPortici建议将新的论坛消息引导到Atmel社区使用的服务器和平台上的微芯片块,这对我来说似乎很好。迈西尔
以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 Hi, I think at least some Microchip (and Atmel) people are aware of this already. This forum have more than a million messages, and as far as I know, AVRfreaks forum is at least as large. Any change that break links to messages are sure to cause a lot of frustration, and even more angry members than there is already. JPortici's suggestion of directing new forum messages to a Microchip block on the server and platform used by ATMEL community seem good to me. Mysil |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
5250 浏览 9 评论
2037 浏览 8 评论
1958 浏览 10 评论
请问是否能把一个ADC值转换成两个字节用来设置PWM占空比?
3219 浏览 3 评论
请问电源和晶体值之间有什么关系吗?PIC在正常条件下运行4MHz需要多少电压?
2266 浏览 5 评论
791浏览 1评论
682浏览 1评论
有偿咨询,关于MPLAB X IPE烧录PIC32MX所遇到的问题
613浏览 1评论
PIC Kit3出现目标设备ID(00000000)与预期的设备ID(02c20000)不匹配。是什么原因
686浏览 0评论
585浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-12-29 18:11 , Processed in 1.616475 second(s), Total 94, Slave 78 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号