Xenapp性能怎么样

当前环境;
戴尔R730，E5-2695 v3 2.3ghz 14核x 2,768GB内存，2 x 10GB NICS
XenServer 7.0，Windows 2012 R2和XenApp 7.13，PVS 7.13
2 x Nvidia Tesla m10，带有GPU Pass-Through和Grid 5.1
适用于XenApp服务器的Compellent SAN和SSD
我们目前正在试验特斯拉M10。
我们运行混合端点（这些是大多数旧的戴尔PC），其中一些具有专用GPU（有些没有）。
我们最近几个月发现我们的最终用户体验一直在降低，在使用Citrix记录呼叫后，他们认为这是因为我们安装了Receiver 4.4，因为这样可以默认启用硬件加速。
这已经被禁用，但我们仍然遇到问题。
我们是一家建筑公司，主要运行各种autodesk应用程序，即AutoCAD和Revit。
我们的大多数用户抱怨都是AutoCAD性能，但我们也看到了Revit性能的问题。
在Chrome中运行Fishbowl测试我们可以看到它正在卸载GPU相关性，但它似乎也在使用我的终端CPU。
已配置服务器，用户和端点的所有Citrix策略（尽我们所知）以防止卸载到本地客户端。
我们正在阅读的大多数文献都谈到使用Grid和XenDesktop获得最佳体验，但遗憾的是，目前这不是我们的选择，因此我们正在寻找有关如何通过XenApp环境克服这一问题的最佳建议和指导？
我们试图阻止任何类型的终点卸载是不现实的吗？
谢谢



以下为原文

Current Environment;
Dell R730, E5-2695 v3 2.3ghz 14 cores x 2, 768GB Memory, 2 x 10GB NICS
XenServer 7.0, Windows 2012 R2 and XenApp 7.13, PVS 7.13
2 x Nvidia Tesla m10 with GPU Pass-Through and Grid 5.1
Compellent SAN with SSD for XenApp Servers

We are currently experimenting with the Tesla M10's. We run a mix of end-points (These are mostly old Dell PC's) some of which have dedicated GPU's (and some which don't). We have been finding in recent months that our end-user experience has been degrading, after logging a call with Citrix they believe that this happened since we installed Receiver 4.4 as this enables hardware acceleration by default. This has now been disabled but we are still experiencing problems.

We are an architectural firm and primarily run a mix of autodesk applications, i.e. AutoCAD and Revit. Most of our user gripes are with AutoCAD performance, but we do also see issues with Revit performance.

Running the Fishbowl Test in Chrome we can see that it is off-loading to the GPU correclty, but it also appears to be utilising my end-point CPU. All Citrix policies for the server, user and end-point have been configured (as best we can tell) to prevent off-loading to the local client.

Most of the literature we are reading talks about using Grid with XenDesktop for the best experience, but unfortunately this isn't currently an option for us, therefore we are looking for advice and guidance on how best we can overcome this with a XenApp environment? Are we unrealistic in trying to prevent any kind of end-point offloading?

Thanks