E8363B收到的值比预期的高

出现问题时，您是否可以检查是否更改了源或接收器衰减器的值。
在正常模式下，它们会被更改以补偿偏移，因此测试端口电源保持正确。
有时这会在绕过测试端口时导致问题。
可以设置一些偏好来关闭数学补偿。
通常情况下，我不认为这是您的设置问题，但需要检查。



     以下为原文

  When the problem occurs, can you check to see if you have changed the values of the source or receiver attenuators.  In normal mode, they are changed to compensate for offset so the test port power remains correct.  Sometimes this leads to issues when the test port is bypassed.  There are some preferences that can be set to turn off the mathematical compensation.  Normally, I would not think this is an issue with your setup, but something to check.

从你的PM到我，你说没有任何改变。
因此，接下来唯一要做的就是看好坏之间有什么不同。
采取良好状态，单次扫描并保留，将状态保存为.csa文件;
如果再次看到问题，请按住扫描，将状态保存为.csa文件。
发布这两个文件，我们可以看出它们的不同之处。
你说预设后一切都很好，但是你没说它变坏了。
它是否漂移（你PM说没有看到漂移）;
它只是跳，是否有人设置幅度偏移？
当没有人在观看时，它是如何从好到坏，突然和突然出现的？
通常，必须采取措施来触发状态变化。
也许步进衰减器在你不知情的情况下被意外鞭打了？
你在那个盒子里有5 dB步进衰减器吗？
这将是一个奇怪的硬件问题，以前从未听说过，但总是第一次。



     以下为原文

  From your PM to me, you say nothing changed. So the only thing to do next is see what is different between good and bad.  Take your good state, single sweep and leave in hold, save the state as a .csa file; if you see the problem again, hold the sweep, save the state as a .csa file.  Post the two files and we can see why they are different.

You say everything is fine after preset, but then you don't say how it becomes bad.  does it drift (you PM said no drift was seen); does it just jump, does someone set a magnitude offset?  How does it go from good to bad, suddenly and unexpectedy while no one is watching?  Usually, something must be done to trigger a state change.  Maybe the step attenuator is getting flogged by accident without you knowing it?  Is it a 5 dB step attenuator you have in that box?  It would be an odd hardware problem, never heard of it before, but there's always a first time.

在查看仪器状态时，我们注意到功率水平不同。
在一种情况下，它设定为-10 dBm，而在另一种情况下，它设定为-2 dBm。
在-2 dBm时，您可能正在压缩83020A放大器，这会导致B接收器相对于A接收器的功率下降。
这使得B / A曲线低于-10 dBm，这是您观察到的。



     以下为原文

  In looking at your instrument states, we noticed that the power levels were different. In one case it was set to -10 dBm and in the other it was -2 dBm. At - 2 dBm, you are probably compressing the 83020A amplifier, which would cause a drop in power in the B receiver relative to the A receiver. This makes the B/A trace lower than that at -10 dBm, which is what you observed.