段扫描始终处于“步进扫描模式”;
除非您使用1kHz或更低的IF BW,或明确调用阶梯扫描,否则您可能会在线性扫描模式中看到一种众所周知的称为“IF延迟”的效应。这些测量的IF BW是什么;
虽然在这里,你正在使用的FW转速是什么?还有其他问题,包括扫描动力学。
如果您发布保存状态(每个条件保留一个通道),可能更容易确定差异。例如,您是否对每个状态使用相同的校准,或者您是否为每个状态单独获取校准
?
功率是否相同,衰减器设置等0.05度相移很难在任何均匀的情况下准确辨别。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
segment sweep is always in "stepped sweep mode"; Unless you are using an IF BW of 1kHz or less, or explicitly invoke stepped sweep, it maybe be that you are seeing a well known effect called "IF delay" in the linear sweep mode.
What is your IF BW for these measurements; and while were at it, what is the FW rev you are using?
There could be other issues as well, including sweep dynamics. If you post a saved state, which a channel in hold for each of you conditions, it might be easier to ascertain the difference.
For example, do you use the same calibration for each state, or do you acquire a calibration for each on independently? Is the power the same, attenuator settings, etc. 0.05 degrees phase shift is very difficult to discern accurately in any even.
段扫描始终处于“步进扫描模式”;
除非您使用1kHz或更低的IF BW,或明确调用阶梯扫描,否则您可能会在线性扫描模式中看到一种众所周知的称为“IF延迟”的效应。这些测量的IF BW是什么;
虽然在这里,你正在使用的FW转速是什么?还有其他问题,包括扫描动力学。
如果您发布保存状态(每个条件保留一个通道),可能更容易确定差异。例如,您是否对每个状态使用相同的校准,或者您是否为每个状态单独获取校准
?
功率是否相同,衰减器设置等0.05度相移很难在任何均匀的情况下准确辨别。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
segment sweep is always in "stepped sweep mode"; Unless you are using an IF BW of 1kHz or less, or explicitly invoke stepped sweep, it maybe be that you are seeing a well known effect called "IF delay" in the linear sweep mode.
What is your IF BW for these measurements; and while were at it, what is the FW rev you are using?
There could be other issues as well, including sweep dynamics. If you post a saved state, which a channel in hold for each of you conditions, it might be easier to ascertain the difference.
For example, do you use the same calibration for each state, or do you acquire a calibration for each on independently? Is the power the same, attenuator settings, etc. 0.05 degrees phase shift is very difficult to discern accurately in any even.
举报