Hello SN:在PLTS中,我们插入freq域数据以确保IFFT之前的(freq start = freq步骤)。
在你的情况下,freqStart = 0.01GHz,freqStop = 26.5GHz,NOP = 201,freqStep =(26.5 - 0.01)/ 200 = 0.13245GHz插值后,freqStart = 0.13245GHz,freqStep = 0.13245GHz,freqStop = 26.5GHz,NOP =
floor((26.5 - 0.13245)/0.13245 + 1)= 200来自IFFT的时域数据实际上在原始测量中有200个点而不是201个点。
时间步长=(3.78 - 0)/ 199 = 0.01899ns = 18.99ps,非常接近你看到的18.97ps。
0.02ps差异的原因是时间停止略小于3.78,我们将其四舍五入为3.78(2位数)。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Hello SN:
In PLTS, we interpolate the freq domain data to ensure the ( freq start = freq step) before IFFT. In your case,
freqStart = 0.01GHz, freqStop = 26.5GHz, NOP = 201, freqStep = (26.5 - 0.01) / 200 = 0.13245GHz
After interpolation,
freqStart = 0.13245GHz, freqStep = 0.13245GHz, freqStop = 26.5GHz, NOP = floor((26.5 - 0.13245) / 0.13245 + 1) = 200
The time domain data from IFFT actually has 200 points rather than 201 points in your original measurements. The time step = (3.78 - 0) / 199 = 0.01899ns = 18.99ps, very close to the 18.97ps you saw. The reason for the 0.02ps difference is that the time stop is a little smaller than 3.78, we round it to 3.78 for 2 fractional digits.
Hello SN:在PLTS中,我们插入freq域数据以确保IFFT之前的(freq start = freq步骤)。
在你的情况下,freqStart = 0.01GHz,freqStop = 26.5GHz,NOP = 201,freqStep =(26.5 - 0.01)/ 200 = 0.13245GHz插值后,freqStart = 0.13245GHz,freqStep = 0.13245GHz,freqStop = 26.5GHz,NOP =
floor((26.5 - 0.13245)/0.13245 + 1)= 200来自IFFT的时域数据实际上在原始测量中有200个点而不是201个点。
时间步长=(3.78 - 0)/ 199 = 0.01899ns = 18.99ps,非常接近你看到的18.97ps。
0.02ps差异的原因是时间停止略小于3.78,我们将其四舍五入为3.78(2位数)。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Hello SN:
In PLTS, we interpolate the freq domain data to ensure the ( freq start = freq step) before IFFT. In your case,
freqStart = 0.01GHz, freqStop = 26.5GHz, NOP = 201, freqStep = (26.5 - 0.01) / 200 = 0.13245GHz
After interpolation,
freqStart = 0.13245GHz, freqStep = 0.13245GHz, freqStop = 26.5GHz, NOP = floor((26.5 - 0.13245) / 0.13245 + 1) = 200
The time domain data from IFFT actually has 200 points rather than 201 points in your original measurements. The time step = (3.78 - 0) / 199 = 0.01899ns = 18.99ps, very close to the 18.97ps you saw. The reason for the 0.02ps difference is that the time stop is a little smaller than 3.78, we round it to 3.78 for 2 fractional digits.
举报