嗨,我对LIS2MDL和LIS3MDL都有相同的行为。
我的应用是检测磁铁的接近程度。在大约1厘米的范围内,措施出乎意料。
我已经用其他一些传感器进行了一些实验,但只有一个轴,行为与预期的一样:磁铁越近,测量值越高,直到饱和度保持饱和状态......
我已经尝试过Maciej的命题,但这个过程来得太晚了,措施已经错了。
斯科特你是否设法得到正确的操作?
谢谢
彼得
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Hi, I have the same behaviour with LIS2MDL and also with a LIS3MDL.
My application is to detect the proximity of a magnet. Under about 1cm the measures are unexpected.
I have done some experiments with some other sensors but with only one axe and the behaviour is as expected : the closer the magnet, the higher the measurement until saturation, which stays saturation...
I have tried the Maciej's proposition but this process comes too late, the measures are already false.
Scott did you manage to get a correct operation ?
Thanks
Peter
嗨,我对LIS2MDL和LIS3MDL都有相同的行为。
我的应用是检测磁铁的接近程度。在大约1厘米的范围内,措施出乎意料。
我已经用其他一些传感器进行了一些实验,但只有一个轴,行为与预期的一样:磁铁越近,测量值越高,直到饱和度保持饱和状态......
我已经尝试过Maciej的命题,但这个过程来得太晚了,措施已经错了。
斯科特你是否设法得到正确的操作?
谢谢
彼得
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Hi, I have the same behaviour with LIS2MDL and also with a LIS3MDL.
My application is to detect the proximity of a magnet. Under about 1cm the measures are unexpected.
I have done some experiments with some other sensors but with only one axe and the behaviour is as expected : the closer the magnet, the higher the measurement until saturation, which stays saturation...
I have tried the Maciej's proposition but this process comes too late, the measures are already false.
Scott did you manage to get a correct operation ?
Thanks
Peter
举报