EMPro和HFSS有什么区别？

EMPro是HEMS所做的3DEM EM求解器。
然而，市场上有多种EM仿真技术，不仅有FEM（有限元方法），还有FDTD（有限差分时域）和MoM（力矩方法）。
根据问题的类型，有时FEM更适合选择发动机，反之亦然。
EMPro提供两种嵌入式引擎（FEM和FDTD），因此您可以处理的设计问题类型比HFSS灵活得多。
除了多个引擎，EMPro还为ADS（高级设计系统）环境提供了最佳的集成解决方案。
您可以直接将EMPro设计作为开放式访问（OA）库打开，并使用ADS中的其他电路（原理图）进行FEM仿真。
这使您可以扫描/优化将EM组合为电路规格（如IP3，增益压缩等）的设计，而不仅仅是s参数。
希望这可以帮助。



     以下为原文

  EMPro is 3DEM EM solver as what HFSS does. However there are multiple EM simulation technologies in the market not only FEM (Finite Element Method) but also FDTD (Finite Difference Time Domain) and MoM (Method of Moment). Depending on the type of problems, sometimes FEM is better for the choice of engine and vice versa. EMPro offers two engines embedded (FEM and FDTD) so that type of design problems you can handle is a lot more flexible than HFSS. In addition to multiple engines, EMPro offers the best integrated solution to ADS (Advanced Design System) environment. You can directly open EMPro design as an Open Access (OA) library and do FEM simulations with other circuits (schematics) in ADS. This allows you to sweep/optimize the design that combines EM for circuit specifications such as IP3, gain compression, etc not only s-parameters. 

Hope this helps.

非常感谢您的回复。



     以下为原文

  Thank you very much for your reply.

与EMPro相比，您能否在频率求解器方面取悦HFSS的一些优势？
提前致谢。



     以下为原文

  Could you please some advantages of HFSS in the terms of frequency solver comparing to that of EMPro? Thanks in advance.

您能否告诉我HFSS在频率求解器方面与EMPro相比的一些优势？
提前致谢



     以下为原文

  Could you please tell me some advantages of HFSS in the terms of frequency solver comparing to that of EMPro? Thanks in advance