嗨,
你是否想要在FPGA-Talk上发布c64模拟器?
您具有相同的用户名。
无论如何...
即使您只有数字部件的鹰图,这些名称也不会与Xilinx原理图符号名称相匹配,因此即使转换它也无济于事。
(除了这两种格式之间可能没有转换器这一事实)
所以你需要再次绘制原理图,如果它有用的话。
也许某些HDL描述会在更短的时间内提供更好的结果,具体取决于您要创建的硬件。
有一个很好的综合
Eilert
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Hi,
are you the same guy that wants tu build the c64 emulator as posted on FPGA-Talk?
You have the same user name.
Anyway...
Even if you have some eagle schematic with just digital parts, the names wont match the Xilinx schematic symbol names so even converting it wouldn't help. (Besides the fact that there probably is no converter between these two formats)
So you need to draw the schematics again, if that is useful at all.
Maybe some HDL description gives better results in less time, depending on the hardware you want to create.
Have a nice synthesis
Eilert
嗨,
你是否想要在FPGA-Talk上发布c64模拟器?
您具有相同的用户名。
无论如何...
即使您只有数字部件的鹰图,这些名称也不会与Xilinx原理图符号名称相匹配,因此即使转换它也无济于事。
(除了这两种格式之间可能没有转换器这一事实)
所以你需要再次绘制原理图,如果它有用的话。
也许某些HDL描述会在更短的时间内提供更好的结果,具体取决于您要创建的硬件。
有一个很好的综合
Eilert
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Hi,
are you the same guy that wants tu build the c64 emulator as posted on FPGA-Talk?
You have the same user name.
Anyway...
Even if you have some eagle schematic with just digital parts, the names wont match the Xilinx schematic symbol names so even converting it wouldn't help. (Besides the fact that there probably is no converter between these two formats)
So you need to draw the schematics again, if that is useful at all.
Maybe some HDL description gives better results in less time, depending on the hardware you want to create.
Have a nice synthesis
Eilert
举报