基本上，简短的回答是：“这就是它的方式。”
但是，关于这是否应归类为错误似乎存在争议。
对于客户来说，一旦状态得到保存，它应该以完全相同的方式被召回，这当然是合理的。
这在过去并不是一个主要问题，但我当然理解这种行为令人沮丧。
我可以将此作为一个错误提交，但我不确定它会得到多少优先权。
我们的专家Joel也可能会在这里发声......他总是对这样的事情有一个看法。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Basically, the short answer is: "That's just the way it is."
However, there seems to be some debate as to whether or not this should be classified as a bug. It is certainly reasonable for a customer to expect that once a state is saved, it should be recalled the exact same way. This has not been a major issue in the past, but I certainly understand some frustration with this behavior. I can submit this as a bug, but I am not sure it would get much priority.
Our expert Joel may also chime in here later...he always has an opinion on things like this.
基本上，简短的回答是：“这就是它的方式。”
但是，关于这是否应归类为错误似乎存在争议。
对于客户来说，一旦状态得到保存，它应该以完全相同的方式被召回，这当然是合理的。
这在过去并不是一个主要问题，但我当然理解这种行为令人沮丧。
我可以将此作为一个错误提交，但我不确定它会得到多少优先权。
我们的专家Joel也可能会在这里发声......他总是对这样的事情有一个看法。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Basically, the short answer is: "That's just the way it is."
However, there seems to be some debate as to whether or not this should be classified as a bug. It is certainly reasonable for a customer to expect that once a state is saved, it should be recalled the exact same way. This has not been a major issue in the past, but I certainly understand some frustration with this behavior. I can submit this as a bug, but I am not sure it would get much priority.
Our expert Joel may also chime in here later...he always has an opinion on things like this.
举报
