嘿米兰,
感谢上述解释,但我需要澄清这是如何适用于我的具体情况。
我有多个用户的Session Host RDS服务器;
我必须使用K1或K2吗?
我猜测基于你的解释上面K1是多个虚拟机的理想选择,而不是如上所述的多个用户。
多个虚拟机意味着我可以虚拟化GPU,但我的情况是多个用户连接到同一服务器上的不同RDP会话(而不是虚拟机)。
您认为K2是我的场景的理想产品,因为它意味着所有工作负载都将在主机服务器上,而不是跨虚拟机虚拟化。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Hey Milan,
Thanks for the above explanation but I need clarification on how this applies to my specific scenario.
I have Session Host RDS server with multiple users; will I have to use K1 or K2?
I am guessing based on you explanation above K1 is ideal for multiple VMs and not multiple users as stated.
Multiple VMs would mean that I can virtualize the GPU but my scenario is that of multiple users connecting to different RDP sessions (not VMs) on the same server.
Do you think K2 is the ideal product for my scenario since it would mean that all workload would be on the Host Server and not virtualized across VMs.
嘿米兰,
感谢上述解释,但我需要澄清这是如何适用于我的具体情况。
我有多个用户的Session Host RDS服务器;
我必须使用K1或K2吗?
我猜测基于你的解释上面K1是多个虚拟机的理想选择,而不是如上所述的多个用户。
多个虚拟机意味着我可以虚拟化GPU,但我的情况是多个用户连接到同一服务器上的不同RDP会话(而不是虚拟机)。
您认为K2是我的场景的理想产品,因为它意味着所有工作负载都将在主机服务器上,而不是跨虚拟机虚拟化。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Hey Milan,
Thanks for the above explanation but I need clarification on how this applies to my specific scenario.
I have Session Host RDS server with multiple users; will I have to use K1 or K2?
I am guessing based on you explanation above K1 is ideal for multiple VMs and not multiple users as stated.
Multiple VMs would mean that I can virtualize the GPU but my scenario is that of multiple users connecting to different RDP sessions (not VMs) on the same server.
Do you think K2 is the ideal product for my scenario since it would mean that all workload would be on the Host Server and not virtualized across VMs.
举报