公平的问题，答案是任何人都在寻求企业虚拟化的加速。
通过虚拟化，我们要求CPU运行主机，为客户提供vCPU，管理所有资源，如存储和网络，然后使用VDI我们也要求它是GPU。
最后可以说是最糟糕的，因为GPU是大规模并行的，而CPU本质上是串行的，因此非常不同。
因此，VDI自发布以来就遭遇了不那么优化的最终用户体验，而GRID正在回应这一需求。
使管理员能够在虚拟化架构中共享或专用GPU，为他们增加了一个强大的资源来改变最终用户体验。
即使有知识工作者，也有公共应用程序，如谷歌地球，使用GPU运行得更好，而Office 2013现在正在利用图形加速。
也许更令人兴奋的是，GRID允许虚拟化应用程序，而这些应用程序之前根本不可能，使GRID成为3D游戏规则改变者以及需要GPU的类似强大图形应用程序。
通过虚拟化这些桌面和应用程序，您可以从非常昂贵的物理桌面解锁该关键用户并为其提供移动性BYOD，同时允许管理员集中数据，确保其安全。
这样做的好处并不止于此，例如，添加GPU可以改变密度数学，因为它可以减轻CPU的负担。
关于对一个人公司或家庭使用有意义的问题，足以让DaaS产品为他们的可用资源添加GPU。
正如您所说，它工作得很好，我们只是转向更加图形化的体验，GRID为这些图形带来了灵活性和自由度。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Fair question, the answer is anyone looking for acceleration in their enterprise virtualization. With virtualization we ask the CPU to run the host, be vCPU's for the guests, manage all resources like storage and networking, and then with VDI we also ask it to be a GPU. This last is arguably the worst as GPU's are massively parallel and CPU's serial in nature, so very different. As a result, VDI has suffered since its onset with a less then optimal end user experience and GRID is answering that demand. Giving admins the ability to share or dedicate GPU in a virtualized architecture adds a powerful resource for them to change the end user experience. Even with Knowledge workers there are commons apps such as Google Earth that run far better with GPU, and Office 2013 is leveraging graphics acceleration now. Maybe more exciting, GRID allows the virtualization of applications that before simply could not be, making GRID a game changer for 3D and similar intensely graphical applications that demand GPU. By virtualizing those desktops and applications you unchain that critical user from a very expensive physical desktop and give them mobility, BYOD, while allowing the admins to centralize data, keep it secure. The benefits don't end there, as an example, adding GPU changes your density math as it takes workload off the CPU. To your question about making sense for one person companies or home use, enough so that DaaS offerings are adding GPU to their available resources. As you said, it works great, and we are only moving towards a more graphical experience and GRID brings flexibility and freedom to those graphics.
公平的问题，答案是任何人都在寻求企业虚拟化的加速。
通过虚拟化，我们要求CPU运行主机，为客户提供vCPU，管理所有资源，如存储和网络，然后使用VDI我们也要求它是GPU。
最后可以说是最糟糕的，因为GPU是大规模并行的，而CPU本质上是串行的，因此非常不同。
因此，VDI自发布以来就遭遇了不那么优化的最终用户体验，而GRID正在回应这一需求。
使管理员能够在虚拟化架构中共享或专用GPU，为他们增加了一个强大的资源来改变最终用户体验。
即使有知识工作者，也有公共应用程序，如谷歌地球，使用GPU运行得更好，而Office 2013现在正在利用图形加速。
也许更令人兴奋的是，GRID允许虚拟化应用程序，而这些应用程序之前根本不可能，使GRID成为3D游戏规则改变者以及需要GPU的类似强大图形应用程序。
通过虚拟化这些桌面和应用程序，您可以从非常昂贵的物理桌面解锁该关键用户并为其提供移动性BYOD，同时允许管理员集中数据，确保其安全。
这样做的好处并不止于此，例如，添加GPU可以改变密度数学，因为它可以减轻CPU的负担。
关于对一个人公司或家庭使用有意义的问题，足以让DaaS产品为他们的可用资源添加GPU。
正如您所说，它工作得很好，我们只是转向更加图形化的体验，GRID为这些图形带来了灵活性和自由度。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Fair question, the answer is anyone looking for acceleration in their enterprise virtualization. With virtualization we ask the CPU to run the host, be vCPU's for the guests, manage all resources like storage and networking, and then with VDI we also ask it to be a GPU. This last is arguably the worst as GPU's are massively parallel and CPU's serial in nature, so very different. As a result, VDI has suffered since its onset with a less then optimal end user experience and GRID is answering that demand. Giving admins the ability to share or dedicate GPU in a virtualized architecture adds a powerful resource for them to change the end user experience. Even with Knowledge workers there are commons apps such as Google Earth that run far better with GPU, and Office 2013 is leveraging graphics acceleration now. Maybe more exciting, GRID allows the virtualization of applications that before simply could not be, making GRID a game changer for 3D and similar intensely graphical applications that demand GPU. By virtualizing those desktops and applications you unchain that critical user from a very expensive physical desktop and give them mobility, BYOD, while allowing the admins to centralize data, keep it secure. The benefits don't end there, as an example, adding GPU changes your density math as it takes workload off the CPU. To your question about making sense for one person companies or home use, enough so that DaaS offerings are adding GPU to their available resources. As you said, it works great, and we are only moving towards a more graphical experience and GRID brings flexibility and freedom to those graphics.
举报
