Noob需要建议

我可能已经找到了问题的根源：我有太多基本频率，订单太大;
我试图提取一个基本频率（现在有七个），并将订单数量设置为2或3，现在它在15分钟内工作而不会因为需要太大的计算而中止;
我删除的频率可以从其他频率的组合中找到。
现在的问题是只用2或3次测量不能给我一个很好的解决方案，而且我希望将来还包括其他频率;
有没有其他方法可以模拟这个电路，或者更有效地使用谐波平衡？
我给你所需频率的值，以MHz为单位：130,250,410,615,820,940,1189,1400;
我使用了以下频率（订单数量）：130（4），410（2），615（2），820（3），940（2），1189（2），1400（2）我没有'
使用了250，但仍然发现它，可能是因为它是其他频率的组合。
你能否告诉我这个低顺序是否足以导致错误？
我已经看过手动订单> 15甚至100 ....感谢任何回复的人，问候，J.L。编辑：John Lack于2013年8月3日上午3:29



     以下为原文

  I've probably found out the source of the problem: I have too many fundamental frequencies, with too big orders; I've tried to remve one fundamental frequency (now there are seven), and put the number of orders to 2 or 3, and now it works in 15 minutes without aborting because of too big computation required; the frequency I've removed can be found from a combination of the others.
The problem now is that measuring with only 2 or 3 order doesn't give me a good solution, and also I would like to include other frequencies in the future; is there any other way I can simulate this circuit, or for a more efficient use of Harmonic Balance? 
I'm giving you the values of the required frequencies in MHz:
130,250,410,615,820,940,1189,1400;
I have used the following frequencies (with number of orders):
130(4),410(2),615(2),820(3),940(2),1189(2),1400(2) 
I haven't used 250, but still found it as a result, probably because it's a combination of other frequencies.
Can you tell me also if this low order is enough for the misurements? I've seen on the manual orders>15 or even 100....
Thank you to anyone who responds,

Regards,
J.L.

Edited by: John Lack on Aug 3, 2013 3:29 AM

频率加上谐波和互调音调的数量肯定是任何谐波平衡模拟复杂性的主要因素。
减少这些肯定会减少内存需求。
您可以做的另一件事是利用任何与谐波相关的频率。
例如，在您的情况下，820 MHz是双410 MHz，因此您不需要同时包含这两者。
通过对这两个输入重复使用相同的410 MHz设置，使用值本身为1和2x为另一个，可以“简化”模拟。



     以下为原文

  The number of frequencies plus harmonics and intermodulation tones is definitely a major contributor to the complexity of any harmonic balance simulation. Reducing these will certainly ease memory requirements.

Another thing that you can do is to leverage any harmonically related frequencies used. For example in you case 820 MHz is double 410 MHz so you do not need to include both. The simulation can be 'simplified' by using reusing the same 410 MHz setting for these two inputs using the value itself for one and 2x for the other.

非常感谢，它减少了频率数量（已删除820 MHz）和订单数量。
最大顺序是关键，但我没想到计算时间会有这么大的差异。
此外，抱歉迟到的回复，但我有帐户问题。
最诚挚的问候，拉克兰



     以下为原文

  Thank you very much, it worked reducing the number of frequencies (820 MHz has been removed) and the number of the orders. The maximum order was the key, but I didn't expect such a high difference in computation time.
Also, sorry for being late for the response, but I had problems with the account.

Best regards, 
Lackland