当PNA-X设置有多个通道时平均速度很慢

因为我很懒，我不会设置它并查看它，但如果你发布一个慢速状态的.csa文件，那么我会。
什么是PNA的型号，硬件选项（2或4端口）和什么是固件转速？



     以下为原文

  Because I'm lazy, I'm not gonna set this up and look at it, but if you post a .csa file with your slow state, then I will. What's the model of the PNA, hardware options (2 or 4 ports) and what is the firmware rev?

Joel博士，我终于能够访问测试系统了（它正在用于测试这几天）。
我附上了一个通道的设置，功率扫描的平均因子设置为16,10 MHz IF带宽。
当试图重新开始平均时，该过程非常快，比眨眼快。
（SingleChannel.sta）我在这里附加的另一个状态文件是5通道功率扫描，其设置与上面类似。
当我尝试在其中一个通道上重新开始平均时，完成平均的过程比上面的状态（使用单通道）慢一点。
为什么？
（FiveChannels.sta）这可能不是那么明显有5个频道，但我的测试有时必须设置大约50个频道（因为我需要测量的频率数量），并且平均过程因某种程度而减慢（或者可能）
还有其他原因，这就是为什么我在这里发帖:)）我使用的是PNA-X，N5241A，2个端口，固件A.09.80.20
FiveChannels.sta99.3 KB



     以下为原文

  Dr Joel, I finally able to access the test system (it's under usage for testing these few days).

I attached here a setup of one channel , power sweep with averaging factor set to 16, 10MHz IF bandwidth. When one try to restart the averaging, the process is very fast, faster than blink of an eye. (SingleChannel.sta)

Another state file I attached here is a 5 channels power sweep with similar setting as above. When I tried to restart the averaging on one of the channels, the process of completing the averaging is a bit slower than the state above (with single channel). Why is that so? (FiveChannels.sta)

This may not be that obvious with 5 channels but my test sometimes have to setup about 50 channels (because of the number of frequencies I need to measure) and the averaging process is somehow slowed down because of this (or maybe there's other reason, which is why I post here :))

I'm using a PNA-X, N5241A, 2 ports, firmware A.09.80.20

附件

• SingleChannel.sta22.0 KB
  
• FiveChannels.sta99.3 KB